Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Calls Prison Punishment Unconstitutional
waff ^

Posted on 06/27/2002 2:14:45 PM PDT by chance33_98


Justice Calls Prison Punishment Unconstitutional 
  Email story to a friend  

(Washington-AP) -- The Supreme Court today declared unconstitutional an Alabama prison practice of handcuffing inmates to a metal pole in the summer heat. The court ruled that an inmate could sue over his chaining.

Larry Hope filed suit after he was twice fastened to a hitching post at Limestone Correctional Facility in 1995. The punishment, which was revived by former Governor Fob James in the state in 1995 as part of a get-tough program for criminals, is "obvious" cruel and unusual punishment, the court ruled 6-to-3.

The victory for inmates was partly symbolic. Alabama was the only state to use "hitching posts" in recent years and it has ended the punishments. But the ruling halts a string of Supreme Court decisions that shielded prison officials from inmate lawsuits. Justices seemed disgusted with treatment of Hope who claims he was twice chained to an outdoor pole and denied food and water as punishment for fighting while assigned to a chain gang.

Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, said the practice "unnecessarily and wantonly inflicted pain." The practice was reviewed as part of the broader question of when guards may be sued.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/27/2002 2:14:45 PM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
"What we have heah is a failuh to communicate".
2 posted on 06/27/2002 2:17:03 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Put him in the box
3 posted on 06/27/2002 2:40:18 PM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Next thing ya know, they will rule flogging and amputation against the constitution.
4 posted on 06/27/2002 6:22:03 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
I thought those were punishments already prohibited by the Constitution. Gee, am I missing anything else?
5 posted on 06/27/2002 6:23:44 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Gee, am I missing anything else?

Just my </sarcasm> tag

6 posted on 06/27/2002 6:27:04 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Next thing ya know, they will rule flogging and amputation against the constitution.

Nah, The next thing will be a ruling that the Constitution is unconstitutional.

You heard it here first!

Go ahead, Drudge, run that!

7 posted on 06/27/2002 6:31:30 PM PDT by leadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson