Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martha in Fed Felony Probe/ Gov't looking at whether she lied to FBI
New York Daily News ^ | 6/27/02 | GREG B. SMITH

Posted on 06/27/2002 3:43:50 AM PDT by kattracks

artha Stewart now has a target on her back.

Federal investigators are focusing their criminal probe on whether the homemaking diva gave the FBI a bogus story to cover up insider trading, two sources familiar with the case said yesterday.

The feds are armed with new evidence that contradicts Stewart's version of events in the ImClone scandal, according to these sources.

Now they're trying to determine whether there's enough to charge her with lying to an FBI agent — a felony — the sources said.

The stunning revelation of the widening probe sent stock in Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia plummeting yesterday by 23.5%.

That resulted in another $100 million hit for the homemaking icon, meaning her portfolio is down $273 million since the ImClone scandal broke.

And there was more bad news for Stewart.

The Daily News has learned prosecutors are pressuring her close friend Sam Waksal, former CEO of ImClone Systems, to plead guilty to criminal charges and cooperate in their probe.

In the last few days, prosecutors turned up the heat on Waksal by informing him they were preparing to indict his daughter Aliza, said a source close to the investigation.

Tense TV Appearance

The new developments came a day after the usually unflappable Stewart appeared on TV angrily chopping cabbage while declaring she'd be "exonerated from this ridiculousness."

Last week, the FBI apparently was satisfied with Stewart's version of events. She'd been interviewed in April and told the feds her version of why she sold off her ImClone stock the day before it tanked.

A source told The News then that Stewart was not a target of a criminal probe.

That changed Friday, after Merrill Lynch handed prosecutors evidence that contradicted her version of events.

The key was the testimony of Douglas Faneuil, an assistant to Stewart's broker, Peter Bacanovic, which reportedly differed dramatically from the accounts given by Bacanovic and Stewart.

With the Merrill evidence in hand, prosecutors are reexamining Stewart's April statements to the FBI, as well as a deposition by Bacanovic to the Securities & Exchange Commission, two sources familiar with the investigation said.

In Washington, Kenneth Johnson, spokesman for a House subcommittee investigating ImClone stock trading, said the reports of contradictions in Stewart's story are not surprising.

Pols Set to Jump In

"This whole sorry saga has had a hollow ring to it from the beginning," Johnson said, noting that the committee is still trying to question Bacanovic and Faneuil.

"They'll either appear voluntarily or we'll go knocking on their doors," he said.

In their statements, Stewart and Bacanovic said they had an oral stop-loss agreement to sell her ImClone stock if it dropped below $60 per share, sources said.

But there was no written record to back this up.

Faneuil, a sales assistant to Bacanovic, gave Merrill investigators a different version of events, the source said.

The Wall Street Journal — which first reported yesterday that Stewart was the focus of a criminal probe — said Faneuil initially backed up the stock loss order story under pressure from Bacanovic.

But later he changed his story to Merrill investigators.

He told them there was no stop-loss order from Stewart, who sold her 3,900 ImClone shares a day before the stock went into a tailspin.

One source said there was no evidence that Bacanovic pressured Faneuil to change his story.

But prosecutors are checking to see whether Faneuil's version of events clashes with what Stewart told the FBI and Bacanovic told the SEC.

If it does, Stewart and Bacanovic could face charges of lying to the feds, two sources said.

Boss Pressed

At the same time, Stewart and Bacanovic face the fact that Waksal — the man at the center of the scandal — is under increasing pressure to cooperate with the government.

In the last few days, sources said, prosecutors have made it clear to Waksal's lawyers they have enough evidence to indict his daughter Aliza, 28.

Waksal phoned her repeatedly the morning of Dec. 27, shortly before she sold nearly 40,000 ImClone shares for $2.4 million. The next day, the Food and Drug Administration rejected ImClone's application for a cancer drug, and its stock collapsed.

Lawyers for Stewart, Waksal and Faneuil did not return calls seeking comment. Bacanovic's lawyer, Richard Strassberg, and Aliza Waksal's lawyer, Stephen Kaufman, declined to comment.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/27/2002 3:43:50 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Just curious, how could ImClone know the FDA was going to say no? That's something I have not seen explained in these news stories about the Martha Stewart scandal. Did someone in the FDA tip ImClone off before making the ruling public?
2 posted on 06/27/2002 3:49:42 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"exonerated from this ridiculousness" what would you expect from a friend of bill's?
3 posted on 06/27/2002 3:56:00 AM PDT by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I remember reading that an FDA official sent an e mail to someone at Bristol Myers, who was working with ImClone to develop an anti cancer drug, saying they would not get FDA approval.

4 posted on 06/27/2002 4:07:14 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So why aren't they seeking to hang the official who leaked the ruling?
5 posted on 06/27/2002 4:18:14 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
it probably was against policy at the FDA to release the decision early in an informal way, but that is not the real crime. With insider trading laws the crime is using your status as an insider to profit from such knowledge i.e. 'material non-public information'.
6 posted on 06/27/2002 4:26:03 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
Trying to stop blockbuster information like this from influencing trading, is like trying to keep a cat away from tuna fish.
7 posted on 06/27/2002 4:34:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Before Martha Stewart was "Martha Stewart", she was a stock broker. You'd think she'd have known better.
8 posted on 06/27/2002 4:47:31 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
agreed. but if you get caught, you go to prison. Martha will get passed around to the chick with the most cigarettes.
9 posted on 06/27/2002 5:27:10 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The term: "Just Desserts" just keeps coming back into my head, perhaps a nice torte?

10 posted on 06/27/2002 6:00:29 AM PDT by Still Using Air
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Using Air
Now we'll show you how to make a plea bargain using an egg carton, some left-over tuna casserole and an empty tube of Crest. It's a good thing.
11 posted on 06/27/2002 11:02:36 AM PDT by Zansman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Calling Ivan Boesky!!
12 posted on 06/27/2002 1:13:34 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson