Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Advertisers Jumpy Over the Scandal: Martha's mess getting messier
NY DAILY NEWS ^ | 6/27/02 | TRACY CONNOR

Posted on 06/27/2002 3:06:41 AM PDT by Liz

The scandal swirling around Martha Stewart is starting to make some of her advertisers nervous.

Several companies that buy space in her magazines said they are monitoring the crisis — and experts said advertisers may abandon the enterprises.

California Closets spokeswoman Jan Schlesinger started paying close attention to Stewart's insider-trading woes this week.

"We're definitely watching it, because it can get squirrely," she said. "We have a marketing committee meeting tomorrow, and I bet they're going to be asking questions about this."

Restoration Hardware, which bought space in two issues of Martha Stewart Living this spring, "absolutely would" take the scandal into consideration if it were placing more ads.

Image Is Everything

"Her empire is based on her character and image," spokesman David Glassman said. "A person like that shouldn't even come under suspicion because her entire brand is based on her as a human being."

Pension fund TIAA-CREF said it is sticking by Stewart, but first-time advertiser Spa Palace is keeping an eye on the headlines.

"It depends on how far the case goes," marketing manager Maira Briceno said.

Martin Walker, a magazine consultant with Walker Communications, predicted other publications will try to take advantage of Stewart's vulnerability.

"All the competitive sales people are going to go out and say [to advertisers], 'Do you really want to identify yourself with Martha?' There are skittish mainstream advertisers who avoid anything controversial," Walker said.

It doesn't appear any firms have yanked ads from Stewart's magazines, syndicated TV show or CBS' "Early Morning Show," which runs a Stewart segment.

Depends on Shoppers

Scott Donaton, editor of Advertising Age, said that if consumers support Stewart, most companies won't pull their ads.

"But some will care. There will be some that will say, 'As long as there are questions, I don't want to be associated with it,'" he said.

And if Stewart's minions turn on her, it could be disastrous. As few as 20 letters from consumers to advertisers could scare them off, Donaton said.

"U.S. advertisers tend to be very conservative," he said.

Tom DeCabia of media-buying agency PHD said Stewart's TV show is not a ratings winner — so it isn't popular enough to weather a big advertising exodus.

Significant ad losses would force the 150 television stations that carry the show to decide "whether to cut bait and look for other properties to air," he said.

"This story could get real ugly."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/27/2002 3:06:41 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz
I am beginning to think Martha made a lot of enemies in the press and particularly in New York. Despite her association with the Clintons, she seems to drawing a lot of fire.

Interesting.

2 posted on 06/27/2002 3:15:38 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Do you have any proof that the narcissitic Senator from New York (a.k.a. Wide Load) had anything to do with this?
3 posted on 06/27/2002 3:53:24 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz
As few as 20 letters from consumers to advertisers could scare them [advertisers] off...

Twenty FReepers needed to contact Stewart advertisers so the prissy Dem donor goes to the poor house!

4 posted on 06/27/2002 4:58:01 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
Martha Stewart held a fundraiser at her home for democrats. Bill Clinton was the featured guest. She was all set to do a big feature in her magazine about the luncheon (" A Luncheon for the President" or something like that) when the news broke that he had lied about his relationship with Monica. The story was pulled on the advice of her business and advertising staff.

This Wall Street scandal broke right before she was getting ready to host a democrat fundraiser for Senatorial candidates. The event was cancelled.

So, yes, I do think there is a definite connection. She has been a long-time supporter of both Clintons (remember her decorating the White House for Christmas..it was a TV special).

Thus, my conclusion is that she has REALLY ticked off some people in the New York press and has lost her immunity from press scorn. OR she is being thrown out as a sacrificial lamb, and there are bigger fish to fry that we are being distracted from noticing.

5 posted on 06/27/2002 5:06:42 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I am beginning to think Martha made a lot of enemies in the press and particularly in New York.
Despite her association with the Clintons, she seems to drawing a lot of fire.

"Despite" her association? I would say because of it......but then I'm eternally optimistic....

6 posted on 06/27/2002 5:07:57 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Twenty FReepers needed to contact Stewart advertisers so the prissy Dem donor goes to the poor house!

Betcha they get a heck of a lot more than twenty.

7 posted on 06/27/2002 5:20:47 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All
"Twenty FReepers needed to contact Stewart advertisers so the prissy Dem donor goes to the poor house! Betcha they get a heck of a lot more than twenty. "

Definitely freepable as justice may not be done. With the mention of marketing meetings and jittery advertisers, a little citizen/consumer contact with them may have an effect: "I've been following this story closely and MS is starting to look like she broke the law. I think that your company and products would not want to be associated with the same. Just wanted to let you know how I felt" type calls could have some impact. I do feel that way, by the way. Elitist envy? Not. Equal treatment? Definitely.

Anybody know who the advertisers are?

8 posted on 06/27/2002 6:36:35 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; MeeknMing
Potential activism ping request....
9 posted on 06/27/2002 7:35:46 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

MSO down another 5.58% today bttt....
10 posted on 06/27/2002 8:24:39 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Make that over 7% bttt...
11 posted on 06/27/2002 8:47:19 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"This story could get real ugly."

COULD?

It already is.

12 posted on 06/27/2002 8:49:46 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
Do you have any proof that the narcissitic Senator from New York (a.k.a. Wide Load) had anything to do with this?

First laugh of the day....kudos!

13 posted on 06/27/2002 8:50:47 AM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
MSO down another 5.58% today bttt....Make that over 7% bttt...

Thanks for updates on MSO's decline.....LOL.....

What's she worth now? Buck fifty?

14 posted on 06/27/2002 9:21:50 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson