Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Has anyone really considered the consequence of establishing a Palestinian state - the consequence to itself?

Think about it: right now (aside from the ongoing "you slap me, I slap you" games) the Palestinians are basically part of a second-world nation, with various benefits thereof. Decent jobs are available, standard gov't services are provided, basic food & goods & services are available, etc.

BUT...should a separate state be created, can it survive? With practically no farming or industry or ports of its own, with much of the jobs severely reduced by a new real border with real checkpoints & visas, with no gov't services provided or subsidized by its current reluctant supporter, with no apparent motivation on the citizens' parts toward self-sufficiency, and with a total size so small as to be practically impotent in all national/international matters, creating a Palestinian state would regress the Palestinians to a seriously third-world status with no hope or purpose except war.

Perhaps the strategy SHOULD be "give 'em enough rope and they'll hang themselves". As an occupied territory, they'll whine & moan forever. As a soveriegn nation, methinks they'll regress (either on their own or as consequence to attacking Israel) to the natural state of the region: barren wasteland. Maybe Bush is onto something...

94 posted on 06/27/2002 11:16:21 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
Bush's comments have been to draw a line in the sand for Arafat and the Palis, thats all. Of course he and the Admin know they won't cooperate and do not want their own state.
96 posted on 06/27/2002 12:25:24 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson