Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH CAVES IN TO TERRORISM READY TO ANNOUNCE PROVISIONAL PALI STATE (Klayman is Making Sense?)
JW ^ | 06-19-2002 | COMMENTARY BY LARRY KLAYMAN

Posted on 06/26/2002 8:04:31 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican

One of Bin Laden’s Goals Achieved Through Attacks of September 11TH

(Washington, DC) All of the major news media organizations have reported within the last 24 hours that President Bush is on the verge of formally announcing yet a new Middle East policy, calling for the creation of a provisional Palestinian state, with final borders drawn and full autonomy established within a three year period. Reports claim that President Bush hopes the plan for the new Palestinian state will be adopted at a Middle East peace summit tentatively planned for September. Bush’s formal announcement has been delayed by yet another Palestinian suicide bombing that killed 19 Israelis on Tuesday in Jerusalem.

President Bush’s new policy is a major victory for the Islamist terrorists that attacked our nation on September 11th, and continue to attack our Israeli allies on an almost daily basis. Despite an enormous amount of political rhetoric and posturing, President Bush has conceded to terrorist demands, perhaps to also placate Arab/American oil interests in the region. Terrorists have effectively succeeded in “murdering their way” to concessions from the American government. One of Osama bin Laden’s and his al Qaeda organization’s strategic objectives has been achieved. Yassir Arafat and his murderous thug cohorts will achieve “statehood” thanks to President Bush.

“The message of President Bush and the Bush Administration is that you can kill almost 3,000 Americans and get what you want, a Palestinian state. This neither furthers the war against terrorism nor enhances U.S. respect and credibility internationally. To the contrary, the bludgeoning of Israel into acceding to a provisional Palestinian state not only creates a fait accompli, but encourages more terrorism,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel
KEYWORDS: bush; bushbdaman; bushbotsunite; bushloversunite; drinkbushlemonade; dubyarules; golarrygo; iamlonely; ihatelarryyoushould2; ilovedubya; israel; jw; klayman; looking4friends; lost; mind; palistatepeace; singlewomenapplyhere; threadbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-271 next last
To: Registered
BTW, your response about what Larry does in comparison to what I do, makes him out to be a Democratic PAC.

Thanks for answering the question.

One last thing. You don't have to do everything Cuban for me, I criticized lots of policies of the Clinton Admin that had nothing to do with Cuba.

101 posted on 06/27/2002 1:25:24 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Registered
It works for Larry...
102 posted on 06/27/2002 1:30:27 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
BTW, your response about what Larry does in comparison to what I do, makes him out to be a Democratic PAC.

His past work and caseload says otherwise Luis and you know it.

You don't have to do everything Cuban for me, I criticized lots of policies of the Clinton Admin that had nothing to do with Cuba.

And likewise, Klayman is critical of Bush on much more than his Israeli-Palestinian policies. Your thin skin is showing.
103 posted on 06/27/2002 1:48:49 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
"I was never aware that he was actually referred to as a foreign policy expert on the Middle East, rather he is usually referred to as the Chairman and General Counsel of Judicial Watch, which is most likely what he was introduced as."

Below is Larry's stated mission for Judicial Watch, you say that he was probably introduced as Chairman and General Counsel of Judicial Watch.

 Mission

Judicial Watch, Inc. was established in 1994 to serve as an ethical and legal "watchdog" over our government, legal, and judicial systems to promote a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.

As a non-partisan, non-profit foundation based in Washington, D.C., and with offices throughout the country, Judicial Watch relies on supporters, like yourself, to help us root out corruption in our government and to make sure offenders are brought to justice.

~~~~~~~

If Larry was there in his role as Chairman and General Counsel for Judicial Watch, what were the ethical or legal issues he was addresing concerning this?

If you browse through JW's press releases, there seems to be a veritable vacuum of articles critical of the Democratic Party, I didn't see a single one, maybe I needed to dig further back in the archives. This in light of the blockade of the Bush administration's Judicial nominees, Judges that would theoretically, improve Larry's chances of making headway in the courts, with his many cases that he claims are being stonewalled by Clinton-appointed Judges.

Yet JW's silence on this issue is deafening.

Why?

104 posted on 06/27/2002 1:52:49 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Larry hasn't issues a single press release critical of anything that the Democrats have done in quite sometime (I'll let you guess how long it's been)...has the Democratic Party suddenly decided to walk the straight and narrow?

Oh, there's a lot showing here alright...and it ain't a good thing for Larry.

105 posted on 06/27/2002 1:58:41 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Well, you know what you should do? Start a grass roots campaign right here on FR to take him down if you feel he is so corrupt.

Anyone can sit and snipe over things all day long, but you Luis, you're being prepared for a higher calling...by my count you already have a handful of FReepers that will start funding your effort..hehehe.
106 posted on 06/27/2002 2:06:11 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Registered
See! You were wrong! I don't need a PR firm after all!

One last thing...

People in here are constantly taking shots at those of us whom they claim see no wrong in anything Bush does...they call us Bushbots.

What do we call people who behave in the exact same fashion when it comes to JW?

107 posted on 06/27/2002 2:20:29 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Luis Gonzalez
Why don't you two get a room?

hehehe
108 posted on 06/27/2002 2:24:52 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I didn't know Larry was a Libertarian...

Me either...but I was pretty sure he was an idiot. Now I know.

109 posted on 06/27/2002 2:24:57 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Hmm, I've never used the word Bushbot. Never will.
110 posted on 06/27/2002 2:45:48 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I'm not sure that I'd want to endorse a Palestinian state at this time, regardless of what the President is responding to. There appear to be signs that the ultimate Palestinian goal is to take over Israel as well, so helping them do so will not make Bush look any better to conservatives...


111 posted on 06/27/2002 4:31:20 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Judicial Watch
He'll tell you that himself.

I'll admit that Mr. Klayman appears to be outside his professional bailiwick (i.e., exposing government corruption), but I personally wouldn't endorse a Palestinian anything at this point in time.

112 posted on 06/27/2002 4:34:27 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
...premature speculation...

I beg your pardon. :-)

113 posted on 06/27/2002 4:36:20 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Thanks for clarification...

114 posted on 06/27/2002 4:37:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
I got a Chevy van...
115 posted on 06/27/2002 4:46:45 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Luis Gonzalez
Luis already has a higher calling in life: The Banana Republic Radio Show. Because unlike Larry Klayman, Luis is the expert opinion on everything and thus, he has his own radio show. Luis' qualifications for articulating an opinion supercedes whatever qualifications Larry Klayman has, and that is why Luis is criticizing Larry Klayman for having an opinion.

By the way, when are you going to invite Larry onto your show again? If he ever gets onto your show, I might consider listening in some time.

116 posted on 06/27/2002 4:53:07 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
As a strong vocal supporter of Judicial Watch and its chairman, Larry Klayman, I would personally like to say that I just LOVE Larry Klayman's current events columns. Klayman and others working for JW have been writing current events columns for years and I appreciate this fact.

Evidently, the majority of JW supporters don't seem to mind either.

117 posted on 06/27/2002 4:57:30 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
The majority of JW contributors are very supportive of Klayman's recent actions.
118 posted on 06/27/2002 4:59:11 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I had used the term Cheerleader and Lemming at one time, but stopped doing that a little while ago. I have never used the term Bushbot publically on this forum.
119 posted on 06/27/2002 5:00:54 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Yeah, that's a great idea, why don't you invite Larry Klayman on your radio show and do a Hannibal Lecter on him.

Figure of speech of course.
120 posted on 06/27/2002 6:53:22 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson