Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Releases Almost All Airmen From Stop-Loss Restrictions
European Stars and Stripes | June 25, 2002 | Lisa Burgess

Posted on 06/26/2002 8:50:05 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

ARLINGTON, Va. — Air Force personnel officials have decided to release all but a handful of airmen from stop-loss restrictions that prevented some voluntary departures or retirements.

Air Force officials announced June 21 that they will continue to hold just three Air Force Specialty Codes for officers and 15 Air Force Specialty Codes for enlisted airmen under stop loss, which is a Defense Department program designed to retain members of the armed forces beyond established dates of separation or retirement.

As a result of lifting the restrictions, only 1,826 officers, out of a total Air Force officer corps of 69,069, and 37,349 enlisted airmen, out of a total enlisted Air Force of 290,954, will continue to be restricted by stop-loss, according to the latest personnel numbers available from the Air Force Personnel Center at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

The restrictions that remain apply to both active-duty and Air Reserve Component members, according to Lt. Col. Jan Middleton, chief of promotion, evaluation and separation policy at Air Force headquarters in the Pentagon.

The Air Force instituted across-the-board stop-loss measures Oct. 2 to accommodate the increased operational tempos sparked by Operation Enduring Freedom.

Air Force officials reviewed the ruling in early November and decided to continue stop-loss restrictions on all Air Force specialties.

After another review early in 2001, in March the Air Force released 24 officer career fields and 45 enlisted fields from the stop-loss list.

The latest reduction in stop-loss, by far the most sweeping to date, resulted from a review of the various specialty codes by all major Air Force commands, the Air Staff, the Air Reserve Component, Secretariat and the Air Force Personnel Center, Middleton said.

Airmen who have an approved date of separation or retirement in career fields approved for release are free to separate or retire almost immediately, but "no earlier than July 1," Middleton said.

But active-duty and ARC members who are deployed in support of ongoing operations or are either voluntarily or involuntarily on active duty to support ongoing operations will not be released until they return from their deployments or are demobilized, she said.

Meanwhile, the Air Force will grant stop-loss waivers based on specific circumstances, Middleton said.

In a prepared statement announcing the lifting of the restrictions, Secretary of the Air Force James G. Roche said: "We understand that many people and their families have had to put their plans on hold since stop-loss was first implemented.

"I just want everyone to know that the Air Force and this nation are grateful for your service and the sacrifices you have made to keep us safe from evil."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/26/2002 8:50:05 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Wouldn't want to be on an AWACS right now. Had a friend who literally required an act of Congress to retire. His involuntary status extended three years past his mandatory retirement date!
2 posted on 06/26/2002 9:02:00 AM PDT by antidisestablishment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment
Do we still have the German AWAC's listening to the US?
3 posted on 06/26/2002 9:04:56 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
They were supposed to stop in mid may.
4 posted on 06/26/2002 9:23:28 AM PDT by antidisestablishment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment
Wouldn't want to be on an AWACS right now. Had a friend who literally required an act of Congress to retire. His involuntary status extended three years past his mandatory retirement date!

I have a cousin in the NAVY who serves on an AWACS plane because his vision was not good enough to fly a fighter.
5 posted on 06/26/2002 9:30:52 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson