Skip to comments.
Lawmakers gird for missile-defense funding fight
AP via Navy Times ^
| June 25, 2002
| Alan Fram
Posted on 06/25/2002 4:20:15 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Edited on 05/07/2004 10:11:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Republicans are prepared to fight a plan by Senate Democrats to cut $800 million from President George W. Bush
(Excerpt) Read more at navytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: missiledefense; nmd
The DemonRats would kill their own mothers to shortchange military spending. Pulling this during wartime is truly treason.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Noswad; lavaroise; rightwing2
When will the traitors start to be prosecuted and punished? Sure it will be painful. Sure there will be violent protests by all the malcontents we've allowed to build up in numbers like termites. And sure we may need to deal with them in ways that have not been seen in this country since the early 20th century. So what? Some things are more important than preserving the status quo.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
How is this any more treasonous than Bushs' refusal to close the border, round up and deport all illegals and non-citizen undesireables, limit immigration and develope a civil defense plan during a time of war?
3
posted on
06/25/2002 4:49:52 PM PDT
by
gunshy
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Dear GOP strategists,
Neutralize the DNC by circumventing their leverage in the aerospace industry. Since NASA grounded the Shuttle Program today, our national launch capability is back to pre 1981 levels. This means that the NMD/BMDO program needs launch capability.
Sources for launch vehicles are essentially tied into one corporate entity... Boeing. Lockheed/USA handles STS inspection and the fleet is now too old. The end result is that the US requires a new launch vehicle.
Please permit the free market to create a variety of commercial launch vehicles for the program. This program should create the next generation of aerospace vehicles which can lift payloads to low-earth orbit.
To: gunshy
I never said it was. Trust me, there are some things about the "Bush Doctrine" that I am very disappointed in. I agree with the points that you mentioned, and I don't see any good coming out of publicly undermining Israel's war on terrorists while promising the Pallies a state regardless of the atrocities they commit.
There, feel better?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson