Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada to end Arctic ozone watch
Toronto Star ^ | 6-25-2002 | Peter Calamai

Posted on 06/25/2002 8:22:08 AM PDT by Trailer Trash

Thestar.com
Canada to end Arctic ozone watch

Station shut to save $300,000 for other meteorological needs

Peter Calamai
SCIENCE REPORTER

OTTAWA — Canadian and foreign scientists are blaming government penny-pinching for tearing a gaping Arctic hole in a global network that probes ozone depletion and climate change.

To save an estimated $300,000 a year, federal environment officials have mothballed a scientific observation post near Eureka on Ellesmere Island, one of only two fully equipped high Arctic stations in the global network.

"It's a major loss," said Stuart McDermid, a U.S. ozone expert who helps direct the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change.

McDermid said scientists trying to solve the ozone problem will now have to rely totally for many crucial Arctic atmospheric measurements on a station in Spitsbergen, a remote archipelago north of Norway. They will probably miss some of the crucial stratospheric changes Eureka recorded because the Arctic vortex shifted back and forth over Ellesmere Island.

The Eureka post, known as the Arctic Stratospheric Ozone Observatory (ASTRO), was first touted as a showplace for Canadian high technology and a home for international research.

Since 1993, sophisticated instruments there have measured the thinning of the protective ozone layer that takes place in the stratosphere over the Arctic every spring. ASTRO measurements provided the first evidence that global warming was exacerbating ozone depletion in the Far North.

Ozone in the stratosphere, the layer 10 kilometres to 40 kilometres above Earth, screens out the ultraviolet rays linked to skin cancer.

Scientists from Canada, the United States and Japan also used the Eureka observatory to study other aspects of climate change over the past decade, particularly the northward shift of the jet stream, which has a major impact on the severity of winter storms.

"ASTRO could have played a significant role in understanding why ozone levels in the stratosphere aren't recovering as expected," says Keith Puckett, a senior official with the Meteorological Service of Canada.

Despite a 1986 global ban on ozone-eating chlorine chemicals, the level of protective ozone over most of Canada has not yet begun to recover. One recent study predicted ozone levels will not rebound in this century and could drop lower due to interactions with greenhouse gases.

Peter Johnson, an Arctic researcher who heads the Canadian Polar Commission, said the ASTRO closing will bring international criticism because Canada is already seen as not doing its fair share of circumpolar research.

The meteorological service earlier had to mothball the Mould Bay station on Prince Patrick Island, which monitored weather and climate observations for the entire Arctic Ocean.

"People are really questioning the government's commitment to science in the North," Johnson said yesterday from Kluane National Park in the Yukon.

Federal officials say they must close Canadian observing stations, even crucial ones, to free money to patch up the aging infrastructure of the remaining meteorological network.





TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hotair; ozone

1 posted on 06/25/2002 8:22:09 AM PDT by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Despite a 1986 global ban on ozone-eating chlorine chemicals, the level of protective ozone over most of Canada has not yet begun to recover. One recent study predicted ozone levels will not rebound in this century and could drop lower due to interactions with greenhouse gases

Hey, Johnny, how ya been?

I don't understand the above. Didn't the envirowackos tell us that if we only banned CFC's the problem would be solved? I just don't understand why it is not happening. It can't possibly be that they were wrong again, can it?

2 posted on 06/25/2002 8:55:27 AM PDT by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Maybe the article shoud read like: Canadian Government terminates funding of unreliable and irrevelant data collection.
3 posted on 06/25/2002 9:01:36 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
McDermid said scientists trying to solve the ozone problem...

I didn't even know there was a problem, let alone a solution to non-existent one.

4 posted on 06/25/2002 10:26:34 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oyez
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!
5 posted on 06/25/2002 11:22:06 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Couldn't be that some estimate that Ozone levels will begin to increase in a couple of years. The sky is falling mindset wouldn't be able to handle good news.
6 posted on 06/25/2002 11:25:38 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
The climate model needs data. The new Japanese supercomputer at the Geophysical Insittute needs to be fed. More data, not less.
7 posted on 06/25/2002 11:28:43 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Didn't the envirowackos tell us that if we only banned CFC's the problem would be solved? I just don't understand why it is not happening. It can't possibly be that they were wrong again, can it?

Even in the 70's scientists realized that CFCs would remain in the stratosphere for decades, destroying ozone. That is why banning their release was important. CFCs have still not been totally banned, they are being phased-out. The 100% ban will not be world-wide until 2010. Some other ozone-depleting chemicals have not even begun their phase-out and the current schedule of the Montreal Protocol doesn't call for the last of them to be banned entirely until 2040.

In other words, the situation will most likely get worse before it gets better. Fortunately, Ronald Reagan and George Bush had the foresight to sign on to the accords which will eventually solve the problem.

8 posted on 07/02/2002 4:18:10 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
You pre-assume that humans are responsible for the Ozone depletion.

I don't accept that as a prima facie fact.
9 posted on 08/01/2002 4:58:10 AM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
You pre-assume that humans are responsible for the Ozone depletion.

I don't pre-suppose it. I have read up on the matter. There has been extensive research on this topic going back 30 years, which all confirms that ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere is a result of chlorine compounds released in the lower atmosphere.

This is nothing to do with 'global warming,' whose human involvement is contested by some scientists. The two atmospheric phenomena are unrelated.

Here is an informative article on ozone depletion, if you want to learn more. It is from the Centre for Atmospheric Science at Cambridge Univeristy. Ozone Hole Tour

I don't accept that as a prima facie fact.

You don't have to. Review the research yourself. Become informed.

10 posted on 08/01/2002 3:18:43 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson