Posted on 06/25/2002 8:22:08 AM PDT by Trailer Trash
|
|
|
|
Hey, Johnny, how ya been?
I don't understand the above. Didn't the envirowackos tell us that if we only banned CFC's the problem would be solved? I just don't understand why it is not happening. It can't possibly be that they were wrong again, can it?
I didn't even know there was a problem, let alone a solution to non-existent one.
Even in the 70's scientists realized that CFCs would remain in the stratosphere for decades, destroying ozone. That is why banning their release was important. CFCs have still not been totally banned, they are being phased-out. The 100% ban will not be world-wide until 2010. Some other ozone-depleting chemicals have not even begun their phase-out and the current schedule of the Montreal Protocol doesn't call for the last of them to be banned entirely until 2040.
In other words, the situation will most likely get worse before it gets better. Fortunately, Ronald Reagan and George Bush had the foresight to sign on to the accords which will eventually solve the problem.
I don't pre-suppose it. I have read up on the matter. There has been extensive research on this topic going back 30 years, which all confirms that ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere is a result of chlorine compounds released in the lower atmosphere.
This is nothing to do with 'global warming,' whose human involvement is contested by some scientists. The two atmospheric phenomena are unrelated.
Here is an informative article on ozone depletion, if you want to learn more. It is from the Centre for Atmospheric Science at Cambridge Univeristy. Ozone Hole Tour
I don't accept that as a prima facie fact.
You don't have to. Review the research yourself. Become informed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.