I was banned once. People used to know me as MarkWar. Over a year or two, I put up such threads like La Belle Dame Sans Merci and Prohibition a Good Thing?! (my title) and Constitution as a _Conceptual_ Maginot Line and Blue Nation has Turned America into "Junkie Girl".
I don't believe anything I ever posted was covered by the "explanation" that:
"Those who get booted are usually posters who post racist materials, posters who post anti-Semitic materials, posters who post Holocaust denial materials, those who spread the "Protocols" nonsense propaganda, those who post Marxist propaganda and attempt to pass it off as truth, those who deal in tinfoil hat conspiracy theory, those who condemn others based on race or religion..."
Not only do I believe such explanations which tar and feather me as a racist/marxist/anti-semite, etc. (those are the people you say who get banned) are unpleasant and simply untrue, but people like BlackJade and many others don't fall into any of those catagories either.
This was my home away from home. I loved it here. Anyone who looks at the threads I put up can see that I wasn't a trouble maker. I loved it here, and I worked my ass off to add value and conservative content that many people enjoyed, and many people felt was unique. Yet I got banned.
Please, Jim, do what you want to do. Run the site however you want to run it. I still love it here. I still love the people here. But why do you make a bad situation worse by saying your banning policies are one thing, when everyone can see (and, sadly, so many have experienced) that they are really something else entirely?
-- KotS
So besides being an incredible jerk, you engage in personal attacks, you post vulgarity and profanity, you vote for Clinton because you were "SO disgusted with the way Bush I handled the Gulf War" proving that you are unqualified to vote (either that or you are really a liberal agent provocateur), your anti-establishment communist propaganda proves that you hate America and then you trash the president with Marxist propaganda that only a tinfoil hatter would swallow.
Then you register a new account to get around the ban making you eligible for auto nuking on sight. Then you lie about it in a failed attempt to make FR look bad to the public, but not only did you fail in your smear attempt, you actually proved my point.
No reason to ban you my foot. Your 9/11 B/S stacked on top of all the other crap eaned you a lifetime bannishment. I nuked your account myself. Now I'm going to ask the FReepers what should be done with your current account.
What say ye, FReepers? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
Yes, I believe GWB knew about the 9/11 attack in advance -- you lump of rock -- and yes I believe he (and the whole Establishment that he is a high part of) either directly participated or stepped aside and allowed it to happen. What could be more clear from my posts? In the post you pulled that quote from I also say: "'Criminally negligent' doesn't even begin to cover what I think GW was/is..." I flat out said it more than 20 posts ago, yet you go on and on accusing me of being evasive. Are you blind from chewing gum?!
[sighs] It appears we've achieved something like a critical mass and we can now all step back and allow the chain reaction of our different perspectives to explode onto this thread:
From your perspective, you have been the voice of reason, and I have been a sniveling, evasive weasel.
From my perspective, I have presented my views on the Establishment's complicity in the 9/11 attacks, and you have sat around watching the spiders crawl in and out of your anus, occasionally glancing up to flop your fingers against your keys and inflict pseudo-random gibberish onto me and this thread.
I believe we are done.
Mark W.
54 posted on 5/22/02 9:25 AM Central by MarkWar
It pains me to say this, but in interest of full disclosure and all that -- and, because as I said, Conservatives respect the truth even when the truth hurts -- I was SO disgusted with the way Bush I handled the Gulf War that I voted for Clinton.
Mark W.
21 posted on 5/18/02 12:06 PM Central by MarkWar Admin
To: Romulus
>Jewsweek!?
[laughs] I have no idea if this site is real, or some kind of parody. I have no idea if this thread will last longer than 30 minutes.
But I do appreciate "Jewsweek" making this photo available:
[picture of olympic skater Sasha Cohen and link to 'jewsweek']
Mark W.
5 posted on 1/31/02 10:58 AM Eastern by MarkWar
Are there any Freeper billionaires out there who'd care to finance something like "EXODUS AMERICA" -- in which Freepers can leave Blue Nation America en mass and then let the terrorists do some "landscaping" on urban America? Mark W.
4 posted on 12/27/01 11:09 AM Pacific by MarkWar
"We are getting way too many complaints about the picture of the guy vomitting. Admin Moderator"
08:08:26 Remove this comment Fuck you.
Mark W.
25 posted on 10/27/01 10:56 AM Eastern by MarkWar
posted:WARNING: ADULT CONTENT SEXUAL CONTENT DO NOT READ FURTHER WITHOUT PERMISSION OF AN ADULT DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU ARE EASILY OFFENDED
Ummm, she may have to worry...
I've read that there is an old saying in the Middle East:
If you want to experience being a father, have sex with a woman. If you want to experience pleasure, have sex with a young boy. If you want to experience incomparable ecstasy, have sex with a melon.
Let's see. A TV newswoman who's built like a 12 year old boy -- In a way, that would be 3 out of 3...
Mark W.