To: jacquej
I may need to be corrected here, but I was under the impression that opening statements were NOT evidence. At least that is what I thought I heard the judge tell the jury... Not evidence..it's kind of a preview of what they'll see. If feldman LIED to the jury...that would be bad.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
if Dusek lied to the jury, wouold that be badder ?
590 posted on
06/24/2002 8:02:00 PM PDT by
fnord
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
since there will be a weekend break, maybe some enterprising soul will do a point-by-point comparison between Dusk's opening statement, and the evidence presented. That would be educational.
592 posted on
06/24/2002 8:04:11 PM PDT by
fnord
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"Not evidence..it's kind of a preview of what they'll see. If feldman LIED to the jury...that would be bad." Why do you single out Feldman here, Kim? Don't you think it would be just as bad, if Dusek lied to the jury?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Well why the heck not. Dusek lied. The hair in the sink was NOT Danielle's.
669 posted on
06/24/2002 9:29:37 PM PDT by
Jaded
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson