[MizSterious]

"They have the same feelings about dw defenders..there's just a bickering back and forth..between 2 groups."

I had promised myself I would not answer another single one of your posts, but I couldn't let this one go. I just couldn't.

Those of us here asking the questions about the prosecution's shaky case are not defending anyone, and certainly not DW. We don't even know the guy.

What we are defending is our American justice system--the way it was intended to work, not the way it's being twisted in this case we're watching now. In our country, we were told from grade school on that we don't execute innocent people. Of course, we have, but the principle is a good one: the prosecution must prove their case with strong evidence before this can happen. Beyond a reasonable doubt. By reasonable, I don't mean any "what if" but good, honest, reasonable doubt. If the citizens don't demand that this criteria be met, our justice system and the legal protections that go with it will go the way of the 2nd Amendment in the liberal states.

By proof, I mean something more than innuendo, rumor, speculation, winks and nudges. They must prove their case with good, hard evidence. The blood on the jacket might approach that criteria, unless Feldman can find a reasonable (not just any) explanation. DW's tissue under her fingernails would have done the trick, also. But grocery lists, newspaper ads (that everyone in the SD country area received), sweating, cooperating with police, and a few stray hairs that could have been cross contamination or carried in on someone's shoes should not rise to the level of a guilty verdict in a death penalty case.

If it does--and it's not impossible that it does--then our beloved country and its Constitution is in trouble. Frankly, I consider people who seek to bypass the justice system simply because they think they know who did it (in any crime) to be enemies of country as much as any other terrorist.

[fnord]

hear hear

Well said. I am so danged tired of being referred to as a 'DW defender' when I just want to evidence of guilt.

[theirjustdue]

Miz, your 429 couldn't be put any better. Thank you.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

#429 is a most excellent post and is spot on.

Thank you, Miz. I think you spoke for many of us with that articulate explanation.

[UCANSEE2]

then our beloved country and its Constitution is in trouble.

HELLO Gracious Lady and I am glad you are back !!!!!!

Just wanted to put in my 2 stinking cents on what you said.

First I agree with you.

Second I believe Our Constitution is in trouble, I believe we have mostly lost OUR country and OUR rights, AND I WANT EM BACK !

I want the guilty to face PROPER FAIR JUSTICE and the NOT GUILTY to GO FREE.

But as I have been told PEOPLE IN HELL WANT ICEWATER. So, I fight for it, but , again, it is a big UPHILL BATTLE.

[Jaded]

Well said. I salute you Miz.

[sbnsd]

Well said, Miz!

[cyncooper]

Frankly, I consider people who seek to bypass the justice system simply because they think they know who did it (in any crime) to be enemies of country as much as any other terrorist.

Explain this comment, please.

[Lucky]

Plus, the scary thing about it is, it could be any one of us some day sitting in court being accused of something we didn't do. That would make me sweat, alright. May the truth be found.

[Mrs.Liberty]

Excellent #429 Miz...

[dread78645]

And this was bared for a week

[FresnoDA]

POST 429.....BUMP and Hee-Haw....SAW-LOOT!!! BTTT