Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Emmylou
These men are not "confused."

They're homosexuals for one. They used a surrogate mother for two. They want to adopt a child into a disordered relationship for three. All of these actions are disordered and intrinsically evil.

Basically, their lives are a mess. And their children's lives will be a mess.

I don't know whether they're sinners or not, since their guilt depends upon their understanding of the nature of their actions. Nevertheless, it is the resposibility of the rest of society to prevent such adoptions.

50 posted on 06/24/2002 12:37:25 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
So, would you actually infer from this issue and your reading of Aquinas that if one is confused about the rightness or wrongness of one's action, then that action is ipso facto without sin? Amazing, if true.

I rather think that brother Aquinas would prefer the maxim of doing nothing, if such confusion exists. That is the first principle when considering the typical abortion. If you do nothing, what is the result? The result is a baby. A human being.

Primun non nocere. First, do no harm.

These guys are selfish. They could have adopted any number of disabled, unfortunate, unwanted children, but no, they have to be showboats for the gay cause, no matter what they say about not wanting publicity. You don't give high-profile interviews with newspapers if you're not after publicity.

It's all about them, don't doubt it...

55 posted on 06/24/2002 2:45:05 PM PDT by maturin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson