Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan(9698)
You should read the 1942 decision.

You should read the Constitution


9 posted on 06/24/2002 7:40:15 AM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: TheOtherOne
If you will read the 1942 decision, you will find that the Supreme Court explains that the provisions they are ruling upon are in the Constitution.

They explain that rules of war have been in the constitution from the beginning. They are based on common law rules of war and rules of war passed by congress. They were ammended after the war of 1812 to include U.S. Citizens.

They were used extensively in the Civil War.

There is nothing new in how they are to be used.

Again, you should download the decision and read it. It is 17 pages and very enlightening. The decision was 8 to 0.

It is constitutional. Law enforcement cannot deal with preventing spies and sabatours. That is why the rules of war were passed by congress. It is a war issue not a law enforcement issue.

14 posted on 06/24/2002 1:16:47 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: TheOtherOne
Constitution? That old thing?

Our President said that Padilla "is a bad man, and he needs to be locked up." That should be enough.

< /Kool-Aid >

54 posted on 06/25/2002 8:53:34 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: TheOtherOne
Re: You should read the 1942 decision.

You should read the Constitution

I've read both. The 42 decision stands firm.

58 posted on 06/25/2002 10:20:17 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson