Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry on China Issues
Issues 2001 ^

Posted on 06/23/2002 12:03:34 PM PDT by Gillmeister

John Kerry on China Click here for 2 full quotes OR click here for background on China. Voted YES on permanent normal trade relations with China. (Sep 2000) Voted YES on killing a bill for trade sanctions if China sells weapons. (Sep 2000)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: china; kerry
Can someone ask this dolt how he can vote to NOT sanction China if found that they sell weapons? Is there any legitimate News Reporter will the gonads to ask him this?
1 posted on 06/23/2002 12:03:34 PM PDT by Gillmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
I am not about them selling weapons, believe me. I am definately not a pro CCP China hand either, but sanctions don't work that well in stopping what we want stopped.

Sanctions don't take into account why China proliferates...

Sanctions won't stop them because there is a much deeper reason for their actions.

Sanctions only work sometimes.

China has to be dealt with on a two front scale. 1. a much broader scale, IE a composite approach to Asia... and 2. a specific engagement on certain issues that we have concerns over.

Just issuing sanctions on them, without being in a greater context, doesnt do a whole lot...

PNTR only continued to give what was already being given to China since the early 1980s. PNTR did not extend any new favors to China. All it did was told the Senate that they did not have to debate every year on China trade, which was approved every year since I think 1981 or 82...

We are going to have to dig a lot deeper than this..

2 posted on 06/23/2002 12:56:29 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
The only way to stop China is to repeal the laws of capitalism. The only reason China is getting stronger these days is because of the forces of economic globalization. The US market is saturated so US companies have to expand business abroad to please the US shareholders. Of the developing nations, Third World democracies like Russia, Indonesia, India, Argentina, Brazil, etc. just are too messy and unstable politically and economically. That leaves China. Indeed, it's not a stretch to say that the entire process of "economic globalization" largely centers on just one country these days, China. It's just a practical matter that authoritarian China presents a more attractive and stable political and economic environment than Argentina or Brazil. Lately, there's talk that democratic Brazil and Mexico might be the next Argentina-type economic and political messes.
3 posted on 06/23/2002 9:14:05 PM PDT by latourette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson