Skip to comments.
Republicans assail stalling on judges
The Washington Times ^
| 6/23/2002
| Dave Boyer
Posted on 06/23/2002 4:59:41 AM PDT by xsysmgr
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Top Senate Democrats met Hispanic leaders at the Capitol one day last week to reaffirm the party's bond with the minority group.
It was also day 407 without a confirmation hearing for Hispanic judicial nominee Miguel Estrada.
"It's a joke," said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I don't want to impugn their sincerity on wanting to help Hispanic people. But it goes both ways. Take Estrada
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
06/23/2002 4:59:41 AM PDT
by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
I heard some of this on C-SPAN. I don't understand why there is no discussion of the administration making recess appointments to the courts of appeals. Surely that's the obvious solution?
To: xsysmgr
"It's a joke," said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch"
No, it's not a joke, you useless nitwit. It's the way the other side plays the game, and it's unconscionable that you and your House counterparts haven't figured that out yet.
If you let them get away with it, they will stall on these appointments until there is another Dem president. You are essentially letting them silence the conservative voice. Grow some gonads and play hardball with them for awhile. And learn to use the power of the majority when you have it. You've been outsmarted at every turn the past 10 years, and it's allowing them to suppress MY voice, MY viewpoints and MY values. And I don't like it.
3
posted on
06/23/2002 5:10:54 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
To: aristeides
I heard some of this on C-SPAN. I don't understand why there is no discussion of the administration making recess appointments to the courts of appeals. Surely that's the obvious solution? We have a "new tone" of non-confrontation now in D.C.--remember? Fact is, the appointment of judges is not in the top 10 issues that Americans care about, so Democrats can probably stall about as long as they want and not get in trouble over it.
What I love is that this issue points out how hypocritical Democrats are about the "diversity" issue. You can have skin every color of the rainbow, but if you're in the least bit conservative, you don't meet the Democrat definition of "diverse".
4
posted on
06/23/2002 5:54:59 AM PDT
by
randita
To: xsysmgr
If this guy is such a good candidate; then why don't they do something about him. All they do is give lip service.
5
posted on
06/23/2002 6:11:31 AM PDT
by
freekitty
To: aristeides
I don't understand why there is no discussion of the administration making recess appointments to the courts of appeals. Surely that's the obvious solution? Maybe Bush is too honorable ... I don't know, but Clinton sure did the "emergency" recess appointments! After all, the courts and judges are of ultimate importance to the Marxist Democrats - their radical agenda can NEVER be legislated into existence, and their Constitutional changes can never be passed in a Constitutional manner; their Marxist agenda can only be implemented through a judicial decree. The Democrats will accept no judge to the right of that Ruth B. Ginsberg thing.
6
posted on
06/23/2002 6:43:40 AM PDT
by
bimbo
To: aristeides
The RINO administration is too busy promoting perverted liberal agendas. According to the paper today, the Justice Department offices were busy last week having Gay Pride Celebrations fully sanctioned by John Ashcroft and attended by his deputy, Larry Thompson, who was the keynote speaker.
7
posted on
06/23/2002 8:10:38 AM PDT
by
TransOxus
To: aristeides
I heard some of this on C-SPAN. I don't understand why there is no discussion of the administration making recess appointments to the courts of appeals. Surely that's the obvious solution? Not a real solution. They would only be in office until the start of the next legislative session (Jan 2003) where the question of confirmation would come up again. For judges, that complicates the process (in fact, makes it questionable), since the Constitution says they must be appointed for life. I agree that Bush should use recess appointments for every position in the executive branch and root out the last of the Clinton brown-nosers.
8
posted on
06/23/2002 8:23:35 AM PDT
by
balrog666
To: xsysmgr
"We've made substantial progress," Mr. Daschle said of negotiations during the past few weeks Somebody should warn Tom that lying stunts your growth.
9
posted on
06/23/2002 2:38:12 PM PDT
by
Texican72
To: Texican72
Somebody should warn Tom that lying stunts your growth.LOL Too late.
10
posted on
06/23/2002 4:22:50 PM PDT
by
xsysmgr
To: DJ Frisat
No, it's not a joke, you useless nitwit. It's the way the other side plays the game, and it's unconscionable that you and your House counterparts haven't figured that out yet.
amen
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson