Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Saddam 'staged' fake baby funerals
The Observer ^ | Sunday June 23, 2002 | John Sweeney

Posted on 06/22/2002 7:37:43 PM PDT by aculeus

The Iraqi dictator says his country's children are dying in their thousands because of the West's embargoes. John Sweeney, in a TV documentary to be shown tonight, says the figures are bogus. Here he reports from Iraq on his findings

The witness against the government of Iraq walked stiffly into the room, metal callipers buckled to heavy medical shoes. They had tortured her two years ago. She is now four.

Her father had been suspected of involvement in a plot to kill Saddam Hussein's psychopathic son, Uday. He fled to the north of Iraq, but the secret police, the mukhabarat, came for his wife, still in Baghdad, and tortured her. When she wouldn't break, they tortured 'Anna' in front of her.

Her father, 'Ali', is a thick-set Iraqi who worked in Saddam's privileged inner circle. He described what they did to her: 'They had a wooden stick. They would squeeze her feet and ask "Has Daddy called you?" - she understood - "Does Daddy contact you?"'

She is a victim of Saddam's brutality, proof that he is prepared to dispense violence against even his country's children. By a cruel irony, her father is also witness to Saddam's efforts to portray those same children as victims of Western sanctions, which he claims have cost hundreds of thousands of young lives.

Osama bin Laden justified the 11 September attack on America by referring to a million dead Iraqi children - killed by sanctions. But there is a belief among many Iraqis that Saddam is inventing the numbers.

Ali, outraged that Saddam's torturers may have crippled his daughter for life, spoke openly about how the regime's propaganda has faked mass baby funerals - 'evidence' of the 7,000 children under five the regime claims are being killed each month by sanctions.

Small coffins, decorated with grisly photographs of dead babies and their ages - 'three days', 'four days', written usefully for the English-speaking media - are paraded through the streets of Baghdad on the roofs of taxis, the procession led by a throng of official mourners.

There is only one problem. Because there are not enough dead babies around, the regime prevents parents from burying infants immediately, in the Muslim tradition, to create more powerful propaganda.

The taxi drivers do what they are told - as everybody does in Saddam's Iraq - to their evident disgust. Before Ali defected to the north, one friend of his, a taxi driver, explained how it worked: 'I went to Najaf [a town 100 miles south of Baghdad] a couple of days ago. I brought back two bodies of children for one of the mass funerals. The smell was very strong.'

Ali continued: 'The taxi driver didn't know how long they'd been in freezers, perhaps six or seven months. The drivers would collect them from the regions and would be informed of when a mass funeral was arranged so they would be ready. Certainly, they would collect bodies of children who had died months before and been held for the mass processions.'

A second, Western source, went to visit visited a Baghdad hospital and, when the official Iraqi minder was absent, was taken to the mortuary. There, a doctor showed the source a number of dead babies, lying stacked in the mortuary, waiting for the next official procession.

Anna was the youngest witness to child torture by the Iraqi government in an investigation, The Mother of All Ironies, to be broadcast by BBC2's Correspondent today. It found six other adult witnesses in the Kurdish safe haven in the north - the only part of Iraq where people are free to speak.

The most chilling witness was one of Saddam's torturers, who was captured spying against the Kurds this year. 'Kamal' told us: 'They would bring the son in front of his parents, who were handcuffed or tied, and would start off with simple methods of torture, such as cigarette burns. Then they started using other methods of torture, more serious ones.

'They would tell the father that they'd slaughter his son, and they'd bring a bayonet out, and if the parents didn't confess they'd kill the child. 'The interrogator has the right to kill the child, or perform any other butchery, whatever's necessary.' And then Kamal chuckled.

It is an absolute of the government of Iraq - and others - that thousands of Iraqi children are dying every month because of sanctions. We managed to get a cameraman to accompany a fact-finding trip into Iraq this year by the Great Britain-Iraq Society, led by its chairman, Labour MP George Galloway.

At the start of the trip Galloway, in Iraq for the ninth time in two-and-a-half years, said: 'Every six minutes an Iraqi child will have died under the embargo. That's every six minutes of every day, of every night, every year for 12 years.'

In 1999 Unicef, in co-operation with the Iraqi government, made a retrospective projection of 500,000 excess child deaths in the 1990s. The projection is open to question. It was based on data from within a regime that tortures children with impunity. All but one of the researchers used by Unicef were employees of the Ministry of Health, according to the Lancet.

The dead babies are blamed by Saddam's regime on cancers and birth defects which first appeared in 1991 and were, it says, caused by depleted uranium weapons. While no one should underestimate the lethality of these weapons and the stupidity of the US military machine, the claim does not make radiological sense. According to Dr Nick Plowman, head of clinical oncology at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, the claim 'is ridiculous. It flies in the face of everything learnt from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.'

Cancers do not develop overnight. Bombs that fell in 1991 could not have caused cancers or birth defects in that year. Fast leukaemias might occur in four or five years, heavy tumours around now, said Plowman.

Richard Guthrie, a chemical weapons researcher at Sussex University, said: 'It's much more likely to be chemical weapons. There are serious clusters of cancers in the south of Iraq near Basra. In the late Eighties, Basra was almost taken by Iranian human-wave offensives, and Saddam stopped these by dropping chemical weapons on them and, by accident, on his own people.

· John Sweeney's report will be shown in Correspondent on BBC2 at 7.15pm today


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2002 7:37:43 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dighton; Orual
Don't let Asner, Chomsky, Steinam, etc., know.
2 posted on 06/22/2002 7:41:31 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
It is general common knowledge in western society where people are able to get information and form their own opinions, that if Saddam sold just one of his palaces, he could buy every one of his citizens a Toyota truck with AC and a CD player, or buy massive quantities of food and medicine for each one of them. But he chooses to funnel his illegal smuggled oil money into covert weapons developement and solid gold bathroom fixtures. Any percieved decrease in the standard of living in Iraq is their government's own refusal to come clean with the military power that kicked their asses in the early nineties. That is the bottom line.
3 posted on 06/22/2002 7:55:13 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Now you know how they came up with the idea to claim that the WTC attack was staged.
4 posted on 06/22/2002 8:11:51 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; Orual; Tennessee_Bob; Ada Coddington
Grave doubts about Saddam even at the Observer. Terrible, just terrible.

Ada, where be ye?

5 posted on 06/22/2002 8:17:22 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
But...but...
6 posted on 06/22/2002 8:22:21 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Grave doubts about Saddam even at the Observer.

And at the BBC.

7 posted on 06/22/2002 8:38:17 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kate22
George Galloway is your hero Kate. I'll give you a chance to deny that you support him.
8 posted on 06/22/2002 9:03:08 PM PDT by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kate22
And a chance for you to deny you support Saddam.
9 posted on 06/22/2002 9:04:01 PM PDT by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ABrit
Actually, George Galloway is an out and out Communist in the true sense and (despite your rantings about the world and its dog being Communist) I do not support him. However, I admire him for taking a red London bus full of aid to Iraqi hospitals and highlighting the suffering under sanctions - at least there are a few politicians who believe in something other than their pay packets.
10 posted on 06/23/2002 2:41:25 AM PDT by Kate22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ABrit
I don't need a chance from you to deny that I support Saddam (how ridiculous). Although it follows from your belief that you have to right to castigate a whole nation. (ie: 'then maybe I will decide that Serbs have the right to be part of the human race' etc...)

It doesn't surprise me to see you trumpeting John Sweeney - he is the most despicable, self-serving untalented writer in the UK and this is clearly a warm-up piece for the attack on Iraq on behalf of Blaair's govt. Why are you on FR when you are a Blairite and a New Labour supporter I wonder?

11 posted on 06/23/2002 2:48:28 AM PDT by Kate22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
bttttttttttttt
12 posted on 06/23/2002 2:48:49 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Saddam will give anyone anything, including protection from harm, as long as one worships such protection and Saddam himself. THose who do not worship such pleasure or Saddam, will have their lives squeezed out of them if that is not what they want. Thus is the life of the persecuted by the self_worshiping and material worshiping thugs.
13 posted on 06/23/2002 3:02:39 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Oh, and people are promised the same fate if they do not comply with Saddam... we better wake up.
14 posted on 06/23/2002 3:03:17 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; dighton
John Sweeney, in a TV documentary to be shown tonight, says the figures are bogus.
15 posted on 06/23/2002 7:06:54 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kate22; Tennessee_Bob
However, I admire [Galloway] for taking a red London bus full of aid to Iraqi hospitals and highlighting the suffering under sanctions - at least there are a few politicians who believe in something other than their pay packets.

Cry me a river.

Saddam Hussein, the Anointed One, Glorious Leader, Direct Descendant of the Prophet, President of Iraq, Chairman of its Revolutionary Command Council, field marshal of its armies, doctor of its laws, and Great Uncle to all its peoples, rises at about three in the morning. He sleeps only four or five hours a night. When he rises, he swims. All his palaces and homes have pools. Water is a symbol of wealth and power in a desert country like Iraq, and Saddam splashes it everywhere—fountains and pools, indoor streams and waterfalls. It is a theme in all his buildings. His pools are tended scrupulously and tested hourly, more to keep the temperature and the chlorine and pH levels comfortable than to detect some poison that might attack him through his pores, eyes, mouth, nose, ears, penis, or anus—although that worry is always there too.

......

Fresh food is flown in for him twice a week—lobster, shrimp, and fish, lots of lean meat, plenty of dairy products. The shipments are sent first to his nuclear scientists, who x-ray them and test them for radiation and poison. The food is then prepared for him by European-trained chefs, who work under the supervision of al Himaya, Saddam's personal bodyguards. Each of his more than twenty palaces is fully staffed, and three meals a day are cooked for him at every one; security demands that palaces from which he is absent perform an elaborate pantomime each day, as if he were in residence. Saddam tries to regulate his diet, allotting servings and portions the way he counts out the laps in his pools. For a big man he usually eats little, picking at his meals, often leaving half the food on his plate. Sometimes he eats dinner at restaurants in Baghdad, and when he does, his security staff invades the kitchen, demanding that the pots and pans, dishware, and utensils be well scrubbed, but otherwise interfering little. Saddam appreciates the culinary arts. He prefers fish to meat, and eats a lot of fresh fruits and vegetables. He likes wine with his meals, though he is hardly an oenophile; his wine of choice is Mateus rosé. But even though he indulges only in moderation, he is careful not to let anyone outside his most trusted circle of family and aides see him drinking. Alcohol is forbidden by Islam, and in public Saddam is a dutiful son of the faith.

-- Mark Bowden, Tales of the Tyrant.


16 posted on 06/23/2002 7:28:25 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dighton
I can't believe that you are so quick to attack and assume so much about my beliefs. I never said anything positive about Saddam or his regime, but I do however believe that bombing and sanctions are wrong and counterproductive. If you visited an Iraqi hospital and saw the suffering for yourself I doubt that you could speak so coldly about this - a child is a child. BTW, we are no longer at war with Iraq (yet).
17 posted on 06/23/2002 8:17:39 AM PDT by Kate22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kate22; Tennessee_Bob; Orual; aculeus; BlueLancer; ABrit
If you visited an Iraqi hospital and saw the suffering for yourself I doubt that you could speak so coldly about this - a child is a child.

Saddam is stealing from the children of Iraq. They'll soon get a lucky break: i.e., Saddam's violent death. Bad luck, though, for Saddam's children, who I expect will depart this world in a similar fashion, at about the same time.

18 posted on 06/23/2002 8:33:15 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dighton
I don't disagree that Saddam is stealing from the Iraqi people. If the US decides that assassinating leaders is the right way to go, I agree that it is far better to do it without hurting anyone else.
19 posted on 06/23/2002 8:50:54 AM PDT by Kate22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
But he chooses to funnel his illegal smuggled oil money into covert weapons developement and solid gold bathroom fixtures.

One day he will get his. It may not happen in this lifetime, but it surely will happen in the next.

20 posted on 06/23/2002 8:57:51 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson