Posted on 06/22/2002 5:26:12 PM PDT by Wolfie
EUROPE LOOSENS ITS POT LAWS
From England To Italy, Politicians And Cops Are Getting More Tolerant Of Marijuana Users
At the end of May, the Senior Judge of England's highest court, Lord Bingham, publicly declared his country's marijuana prohibition "stupid" and said he "absolutely" supported legalization. This sent a shock wave through the nation's political establishment. While many leaders have recently called for relaxing England's pot laws, including the chief prison inspector and several prominent police chiefs, Bingham, known as a modernizer of England's tradition-bound judiciary, is one of the country's most influential judges. With so many officials calling for reform, England's politicians are scrambling to respond. Prime Minister Tony Blair has refused to take a stand, except to say that the War on Drugs is not working. But Home Secretary David Blunkett has announced plans to reclassify marijuana so that casual users will not face prison.
Bucking the American pot-prohibition orthodoxy has become a trend in advanced, industrialized nations ( see "New Pot World Order," below ). Portugal has moved closest to outright decriminalization, with Switzerland close behind. In Portugal, criminal penalties have been removed for the use of small amounts of all formerly illicit drugs, including heroin, cocaine, Ecstasy and marijuana. Only three European nations -- Sweden, Finland and Norway -- still strictly hew to the U.S., model of strong police action against small-time drug users. "There has been a revolution in the laws throughout Europe because there is a widespread recognition that drug prohibition is not working," says British Parliament member Paul Flynn. "The most dangerous way to treat marijuana is to prohibit it and leave its marketing to a dangerous criminal. There has been a stream of misinformaton from America about this."
In England, the move toward decriminalizing marijuana has been led by several crusading police chiefs and commanders, such as Brian Paddick. For a trial period, Paddick instructed his officers in the London neighborhood of Brixton to warn, rather than arrest, those caught with small amounts of pot. Scotland Yard then issued a report that determined that the project had saved 2,500 police hours over six months. Scotland Yard Deputy Assistant Commissioner Mike Fuller concludes, "Initial findings have shown that officers' time saved in completeing arrest formalities and preparing court papers can be put to more crime-fighting use."
One of the first officials to call for decriminalization was north Wales Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom, who says, "Recent research shows that cannabis is much less harmful than nicotine, so it's impossible to defend banning cannabis and allowing tobacco -- the law becomes, in British parlance, an ass."
The movement has received support form politicians of all stripes, including Conservative Party lawmakers. Marijuana-law reformers would like to go even further and legalize cannabis, which would then be regulated and taxed much as alcohol is. "Obviously we feel with reclassification people will get less punishment, whch is a good thing," says Alun Buffry, national coordinator of Britain's Legalize Cannabis Alliance, "but it's a long way from satisfactory. There will be more people selling bad-quality stuff, some of it not cannabis at all." A series of United Nations treaties that require member nations to ban the drug block drastic change; nonetheless the Swiss government -- which has not signed these treaties -- is at least studying the idea of legalizing marijuana.
In the United States, advocates of marijuana-law reform are extremely pleased by the developments in Europe, but pessimistic about a potential domino effect. "The pivotal thing to understand," says Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance in New York, "is that in the United States there is a radical anti-drug element for whom marijuana is a complete bugaboo. There are fanatical anti-drug organizations that are trying to reinforce the demonization of marijuana."
Indeed, George W. Bush's White House equates marijuana with hard drugs. Tom Riley, a spokesman for Bush's Office of National Drug Control Policy says pointedly that the European trend does not mesh with the U.S. approach. "There's a widespread misunderstanding that marijuana is the harmless drug," says Riley, "but the number of people with clinically defined dependence on marijuana is going up in the U.S. -- you're talking hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people." According to Riley, up to 2 million Americans are effectively addicted to marijuana. ( An estimated 50 million are addicted to cigarettes. )
The hard-line American approach is viewed as ridiculous by many European health officials, who say it is not backed up by any scientific evidence. "If you look at the figures, you will see that cannabis consumption in Holland is lower than in the U.S.A., even after the U.S.A. has had this famous War on Drugs for twenty-five years, and we've had a liberal policy for twenty-five years," says Bob Keizer, senior drug-policy adviser to the Dutch minister of health. "And if you look at hard-drug addicts, our rate is stable, considerably lower than other countries. And so, all of the countries surrounding us are gradually following our example."
New Pot World Order
While the U.S. continues to arrest more than 700,000 pot users per year, many of our allies in the Western coalition have sharply reduced penalties for marijuana use. Here's a country-by-country survey:
CANADA -- Pot possession remains illegal, but there's substantial regional variation in prosecutors' zest for punishing those found with small amounts. British Columbia, and Vancouver in particular, is perceived by many to be more tolerant.
AUSTRALIA -- Possession remains illegal, but in some states and territories, possession of small quantities may be treated as a civil, not criminal, offense.
GREAT BRITAIN -- The government has announced plans to downgrade marijuana so that it's not classified with drugs such as Ecstacy. Possession for small quantities will no longer be grounds for arrest.
PORTUGAL -- Possession of small amounts of marijuana, defined as ten daily doses or less, has been decriminalized. People found with the drug may face fines, but not criminal prosecution.
THE NETHERLANDS -- Marijuana can be purchased in government-licensed "coffee shops" and smoked on the premises.
SPAIN, ITALY -- Penalties for marijuana use have been sharply lowered.
SWITZERLAND -- Cannabis cafes and stores operate openly, without government interference, and the government is studying proposals to legalize marijuana.
FRANCE -- Pot remains illegal and arrests are common, but some prosecutors and judges have declined to go forward with cases against individuals using small amounts.
GERMANY -- Pot is still illegal, but police and prosecutors in many regions have become more tolerant of small-quantity users.
The High Peaks of Europe
On The Ground In The New Stoned Switzerland
At Growland, a two-story marijuana emporium in the up-scale shopping arcades of Bern, Switzerland, the product is remarkably inexpensive. Growland is one of fifteen stores here in the nation's capital that openly sell marijuana, and one of 250 nationwide. While it is technically not legal to deal pot in Switzerland, it is also not illegal. Store manager Peter Zysset has been in business for nine years and has only been visited by the cops once.
Whatever the Deadhead on your gift list wants, Growland sells, including ten sticky strains of marijuana -- all grown in Switzerland, according to Zysett. "The product is 100 percent Swiss, mostly grown outdoors," he says. "Already some former vineyards here have turned to growing pot."
The pragmatic Swiss clearly recognize the senselessness of banning a naturally occurring plant that has never killed anyone. In 1999, the Swiss Federal Commission for Drug Issues put out a report proposing a formal policy of cannabis decriminalization. And Department of Health Director Thomas Zeltner has said that "the consumption of cannabis can't be avoided through prohibition" and admitted that "cannabis does relatively little damage to health."
In 2001, the States Council ( Switzerland's version of the U.S. Senate ) unanimously passed a revision of the Narcotics Law, calling for cannabis possession to be decriminalized. The lower house of Switzerland's congress still must ratify the revision; in the meantime, many of the country's twenty-six states ( called cantons ) have effectively decriminalized weed for anyone over eighteen. Buyers are legally required to supply Swiss ID, but vendors only sporadically ask for it, and sometimes accept long-range train passes as proof of residency.
Switzerland's leniency has turned legendary ski towns like Verbier -- located about 100 miles south of Bern -- into magnets for the international burnout set. Verbier reports that in the last two years, the number of young North Americans streaming to its slopes has picked up by about five percent. Perhaps Steve Klassen, a Mammoth Lake, California, snowboarder who traveled to Verbier in April for a competition, says it best: "Verbier is the best venue in the world for extreme snowboarding. I go right from kind-bud Cali to Sativa Switzerland -- do not go to jail, do not pay $200."
I can't wait to hear what FR's intrepid WOD Warriors have to say about this. They'll probably call these policemen "dopers" and "druggies".
Britain's third political force, the Liberal Democrat Party, is moving to put its policy where its platform is. In the party's March convention, delegates outpaced the party leadership by adopting a platform calling for the legalization of cannabis, the decriminalization of hard drug possession and an effort to repeal the United Nations drug treaties that effectively bar outright legalization of the drug trade. Now, a London borough council dominated by Lib Dems is ready to order police to stop arresting hard drug users in possession of small amounts of cocaine and heroin. Under the plan, small time drug offenders would be issued a caution, or ticket, and their drugs confiscated. The plan would effectively decriminalize hard drug possession in the London borough of Southwick
First they'll slam the source, Rolling Stone as leftist, pro-homosexual, anti-gun, anti-Bush fishrap (which, in fact, it is). Next they'll slam Europe as a bunch of socialist pansy-ass weenies (which, in fact, they are) and claim that if Europe is doing it than it is a great reason for us to do exactly the opposite. Finally, they'll chime in about how anyone who advocates decriminalization of marijuana is a marxist, pro-homo, euro-weenie, Taliban-supporting, bong-sucking addict and that if only Johnnie wasn't smoking pot than the police would not have needed to kick in his door and shoot him in the back.
Any wagers?
If saving police hours is the goal, why stop there? We can save some major hours by issuing a warning to every misdemeanor, and just going after the felonies. Takers?
Though I wouldn't doubt if at least one of the drug warriors is a drug dealer.
But they must keep something that is harmless and desirable illegal or they have no leverage. Maybe tobacco or twinkies is the next banned substance after Marijuana is legalized.
After all, Marijuana replaced alcohol after that prohibition experiment failed.
What they cannot do is have people completely run their own lives.
...(which, of course, they are).
Nope, youre logic is off. Drug-related? Probably.
1. The ratio of users-to-dealers has to be about 30 or 40 to 1 to make it worthwhile for the dealers to take the risks.
2. The druggies, such as yourself, who want their "legal" poison, are outnumberd on FR by those who support the drug laws.
3. Ergo, there is no chance that more than a maximum of about 1/30th of those who speak out here against dope are drug dealers.
Oh, and by your logic, that must mean Nancy Reagan is "Mr. Big" for the entire West Coast.
"There's big money and easy profits dealing in illegal drugs. That the reason why drug-warriors on the forum so profusely support it because they're drug dealers. It the WOD was ended they'd be out of business and lose their easy money and big profits. </sarcasm >" 14
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.