Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top UN rights official calls on European countries to portray (ratify Rights of all Migrant)
un.org/News ^ | 21 June 02 | Mary Robinson

Posted on 06/21/2002 7:17:51 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian

Top UN rights official calls on European countries to portray migrants fairly

Mary Robinson

21 June – The top United Nations human rights official today called on European countries, meeting in Spain to discuss illegal immigration issues, to guarantee that asylum seekers and other migrants were portrayed fairly and without stereotypes.

In a message to the meeting of the European Council in Seville, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, said countries should ensure that accurate information regarding migrants and migration issues was made available, including on the positive contribution that migrants make to the host society.

She also invited European Union countries to ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of all Migrant Workers and their Families, according to a spokesman for the Office of the High Commissioner. One more ratification is needed for the Convention to enter into force.

Mrs. Robinson also said that at last year’s World Conference against Racism, countries agreed that stereotyping in all its forms, in particular the promotion of false images of migrants by States and the media should be avoided, spokesman Jose Luis Diaz told a press briefing in Geneva.

The High Commissioner went on to recall that countries had committed themselves to ensuring that police, border police, immigration authorities and other public officials treated migrants, including those detained, in a dignified and non-discriminatory manner and to organize special anti-racist and gender-sensitive human rights training courses to that end, he added.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: unitednations

1 posted on 06/21/2002 7:17:52 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
When is this clown's Reign of Terror over????
2 posted on 06/21/2002 7:20:21 PM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
How come I missed this one?

Where did the Untied Notions get this wierd idea that it could enforce treaties against nations that had never ratified them? Which was the first?
3 posted on 06/21/2002 7:22:39 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolina
LOL, that's exactly what I was going to post. Anyone know when Robinson's term is up?
4 posted on 06/21/2002 7:39:15 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
60 votes
5 posted on 06/21/2002 7:40:18 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
There is something ominous about her title: High Commissioner.
6 posted on 06/21/2002 7:42:15 PM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

While listening to a recorded portion of Hannity and Combs it seems Vincente Fox and others thru the UN is using the idea that "human rights" trumps any soveriegn nation's rights.
7 posted on 06/21/2002 7:43:57 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian

8 posted on 06/21/2002 7:48:07 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
I put in the question to Henry Lamb re which was the first treaty to enter into force over non-ratifying nations. I'll let you know what I find out.
9 posted on 06/21/2002 7:52:53 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
They must be upset that Europe seems to be going hard right on the immigration issue. Europe should, we all should, the idea was to raise their boats in their own countries, not over run Western nations and reduce them to third world status by burdensome welfare and terrible school systems.
10 posted on 06/21/2002 7:55:57 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Carry_Okie
thanks
12 posted on 06/21/2002 8:26:51 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 4ourprogeny; Carry_Okie
POSTED AT 10:54 PM EDT Friday, June 21

U.S. threatens to pull out of peacekeeping operations

Reuters News Agency

United Nations — The UN Security Council approved a brief extension of UN peacekeeping operations in Bosnia on Friday, giving diplomats time to tackle a demand to exempt Americans from prosecution by the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal.

The U.S. has threatened to end its participation in UN peacekeeping operations if the council does not grant Americans who take part in them immunity from arrest and prosecution by the International Criminal Court, which becomes a reality July 1.

The council had been expected to extend the UN civilian police mission in Bosnia and the authorization for the NATO-led peacekeeping force in the Balkan nation until Dec. 31. But the United States introduced an amendment Wednesday barring any personnel from either mission from being handed over to an international tribunal.

Facing a possible U.S. veto if the amendment on immunity wasn't included, the council decided to set the Bosnian resolution aside. Instead, it voted unanimously to extend the Bosnian missions until June 30, giving diplomats nine more days to try to find a solution.

The U.S. demand has put the council in a tough spot because the International Criminal Court enjoys wide support among its 15 members. Six have ratified the Rome treaty establishing the court, six others have signed and plan to ratify, and even China, which hasn't signed the treaty, backs it.

The court's supporters view the U.S. amendment as an attempt to undermine the letter and the spirit of its operation.

Former president Bill Clinton signed the treaty to create the International Criminal Court, but it was never ratified by the Senate and last month the Bush administration announced it wants nothing to do with the tribunal.

The United States objects to the idea that Americans could be subject to the jurisdiction of the court if a crime is committed in a country that has ratified the treaty — even if the United States is not a party.

The government says that could leave U.S. troops and citizens vulnerable to frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions, and that other countries could use it to try American soldiers for war crimes. Supporters contend the treaty has safeguards against this. The court will step in only when countries are unwilling or unable to dispense justice themselves for the most serious crimes committed by individuals: genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte said Friday the short extension would give members time to discuss the immunity issue.

"I think that what we've got to try to do is separate the issue of divergent points of view about the court and try to solve the practical problem at hand," he said.

"The fact that we have different points of view about the court is a given. But now, how do we deal with that fact with regard to the practical issue of continuation of that mission in Bosnia? ...I'm pretty confident we'll be able to work something out," Mr. Negroponte said.

Deputy ambassador Richard Williamson said some countries had made suggestions "and we have been in discussions with our colleagues here as well as in the Capitol."

Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Friday the United States should be exempt to avoid "political harassment that can take place unfairly, particularly when...you're fighting the global war on terror and...the terrorist training books are encouraging people to make those kinds of charges and allegations."

13 posted on 06/21/2002 8:42:03 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 4ourprogeny
yep, that will come next.
14 posted on 06/21/2002 9:00:40 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpChristian
Henry confirmed that the Treaty creating the ICC was the first.
15 posted on 06/22/2002 6:38:27 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson