Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swampfox98
Alright, maybe I'm stupid, but can you explain just why Bush would lie for the Clintons'? Do you actually think after all the crap the media threw at him in the elections, and all they came up with was a DUI conviction in his past; he could have something the Clintons' could blackmail him with? Or tell me what Bush could have done to make him even want to lie for them?

There's been a lot of innuendo going around on here from time to time, suggesting that the Clintons' have something on him. But whenever someone asks that, we get a load of web pages from some conspiracy sites, and some mysterious suggestions, without evidence, that he might have some dark secrets for the Clintons' to get him on. I'm sick of this 'cloak and dagger' stuff!
176 posted on 06/24/2002 2:37:56 AM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: dsutah
I'm stupid, but can you explain just why Bush would lie for the Clintons'

You tell me, buster, because he did it! Luckily, my memory doesn't go onto auto pilot the minute President Bush lies for the Clintons, or tries to protect them. Right before he was to move into the White House Bush told reporters that there was no damage to the office buildings and that Air Force One had not been plundered by the Clintionoids. How in the world can you post on FR and not remember something like that. Amazing!

I suppose you also don't remember that the tax payers have been forced by the Bush administration to pay Hillary Clinton's lawyers when she was under investigation for pardoning terrorists, in order to get elected to the Senate.

Yeah, I guess you don't "remember" that one, either.

182 posted on 06/30/2002 5:33:12 PM PDT by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson