Skip to comments.
A great city's people forced to stop drinking swill? (Berkeley coffee ordinance)
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 06/21/2002
| Charles Burress
Posted on 06/21/2002 6:57:02 AM PDT by Pokey78
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Berkeley -- Berkeley, a place passionate about coffee and progressive politics, could become the only city in the nation to ban coffee not grown with strict protections for workers and the environment.
The proposed ban -- contained in an initiative crafted by a lawyer one year out of law school -- has gathered enough valid signatures to qualify for the November ballot, City Clerk Sherry Kelly announced Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
06/21/2002 6:57:04 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Completely unconstitutional. No question about that.
I would love to volunteer to be the first person arrested for violating this ordinance, because City of Berkeley vs Dog Gone would be a nice education for these morons when they read the court decision.
2
posted on
06/21/2002 7:03:58 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Pokey78
Personally, I'd worry more about the Berkeley City water supply than the coffee going into it.
Anybody that's seen the inside workings of a water treatment plant -- where the treated waste gets dumped into a local lake or river -- knows what I mean.
To: Pokey78
The problem with government regulation is there is no presumption of innocence. You must prove you are complying, rather than the converse of evidence of wrong-doing before investigation.
Were I Starbucks, or the other coffee suppliers targeted, (notice bagged coffee was exempted, apparently they do not care if Folgers or Maxwell House complies) I would take a lesson from Home Depot. Rather than bear the costs of Government regulation as a Federal supplier, Home Depot refuses to sell to the Federal government. Let the coffee shops close up in Berkley and forget about it.
To: Pokey78
"When you look at seat-belt laws, that was shocking -- people freaked out," he said. "But now people accept it as a matter of course." DING DING DING
Todays lesson from slippery slope 101
5
posted on
06/21/2002 7:09:58 AM PDT
by
m1911
To: Pokey78
Isn't democracy wonderful. Will they allow stores' to sell unPC coffee, maybe authorize home searches for smugglers.
6
posted on
06/21/2002 7:11:01 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: steve50
I'm surprised Clinton didn't set up a Politically Correct Enforcement Agency. If the other one ever gets elected you can bet she will.
7
posted on
06/21/2002 7:28:11 AM PDT
by
Dakmar
To: Pokey78
There is ZERO chance I'm gonna buy anything in Berkeley...
BOYCOTT BERKELEY
8
posted on
06/21/2002 7:30:26 AM PDT
by
Drango
To: Pokey78
"It's kind of crazy, typical Berkeley politics," said Robert Fulmer, president of Royal Coffee, based in Emeryville and one of the nation's top importers of fair-trade, organic and shade-grown coffee. "I personally think something like this tends to do more harm than good," he said. "Trying to force something down someone's throat like that just builds resentment."
A lesson that all nanny staters should have to write 1,000 times on a blackboard somewhere.
-Eric
9
posted on
06/21/2002 7:31:51 AM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: Dog Gone
That would be an interesting case D.G. but didn't I read somewhere that Berkeley's City motto is: "By any means necessary?" I imagine that applies to judges, too.
I think anything that deprives Berkeley radicals from caffeine, a stimulant, is probably a good idea. Maybe a soporific along the lines of Soma might be a better alternative.
To: Pokey78
And now that the restaurants are FORCED to purchase from the "correct" purveyors, those purveyors can now cut back on their quality control, cut corners, and increase their profits.
This experiment in social engineering will backfire on them.
To: Pokey78
Berkeley, a place passionate about coffee and progressive politics, could become the only city in the nation to ban coffee not grown with strict protections for workers and the environment. "I think that it's probably only in Berkeley that it could occur, but I think it's a wonderful idea. . . . It would be a nice emblem of the way America should behave in the global economy."
I can envision Madison WI following suit before the end of the summer.
To: Pokey78
To be fair to their own reasoning the people of Berkeley should also be promoting a ban of a more serious issue, banning any and all goods made in China that's produced under slave labor. Please forgive me for using the words fair, reason and Berkeley in the same sentence.
To: Pokey78
Young compared the proposal to laws requiring seat belts or banning leaded gasoline. "When you look at seat-belt laws, that was shocking -- people freaked out," he said. "But now people accept it as a matter of course."Sounds like the perfect argument AGAINST this law.
To: Dakmar
She's coming. God help us
15
posted on
06/21/2002 7:49:39 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: Pokey78
Well this highlight a problem with some of the argument seen here for less federal and more local government control
Here is a case of a nutty and intrusive local law
...
But do you ask or want the federal or state government to tell the local they cant restrict your coffee?
Sometimes the state rights types seem to miss the point that state or local government can be just and intrusive and dictatorial as Federal government.(Just in theory easier to control because there smaller.)
Federal, state or local
......
the problem is not the who doing it.....its the what they assume they can do.
To: Pokey78
"It would require all cups of coffee sold in the city to be "fair trade," organic or "shade-grown." It would not apply to beans or ground coffee sold in bags, however. Violators would be guilty of a misdemeanor and could face $100 fines and six months in jail."
Anyone know where the dang asteroid that missed us a few days ago went?
To: Pokey78
Shade-grown or bird-friendly coffee is grown on traditional coffee plantations under the canopy of forest trees, where more than 150 species of migratory birds live.PC coffee is grown under 150 species of birds!
I think I will stay with my middle of the field grown coffee
18
posted on
06/21/2002 9:42:37 AM PDT
by
TYVets
To: Pokey78
A great city's people forced to stop drinking swill? Note the headline, which is the typical CHRON spin. Non-shade-grown, non-organic, non-approved-by-the-PC-police java is "swill" -- cheap joe more commonly consumed by Contra Costa suburban rubes, than by the Chez-Panisse-haunting leftist Berkeley foodies who are forever dreaming up new and different ways to run the lives of us less enlightened peasantry.
"Let them eat Rainforest Crunch!"
19
posted on
06/21/2002 3:53:56 PM PDT
by
MikalM
To: Drango
I am with you there! now what is non PC coffee? I WILL be drinking exploited worker coffee with great pride and delight! :-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson