Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Loses To Germany 1-0, But Shows The World USA Soccer Is For Real
ESPN ^ | June 20,2002 | Self

Posted on 06/21/2002 6:36:46 AM PDT by Illbay

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last
To: LenS
DON'T FORGET THE WORLD WAR CUP...
USA (and UK, France,etc.) 2
GERMANY 0
141 posted on 06/21/2002 3:17:35 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
Yes, there are faked injuries in American football, but they do seem to be more frequent in soccer. Perhaps it's because collisions shrugged off in American football are credibly more painful without pads.
142 posted on 06/21/2002 3:19:28 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Is it legal to have a second goalie? The German seemed to be standing at the edge the box. The ball hit his stationary arm in the wrist, it seemed to me.
143 posted on 06/21/2002 3:21:40 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: StockAyatollah
Thank God soccer will go back underground (where it belongs) for another 4 years. But I should have taped some of these games as I am sure they are a great insomnia cure.

I think a better insomnia cure would be to videotape one of those major league baseball games that drags on for 3-4 hours in which 10 relief pitchers are used. Talk about sleep inducing - Yawn!

144 posted on 06/21/2002 3:24:35 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
But I want to also take you up on the question of "intentionality". The question has to be answered OBJECTIVELY, not subjectively. The German player watched the ball move to his hand (away from his body, protecting the goal space that he couldn't legitimately block with his body or head) and ALLOWED the ball to strike his hand -- he made no attempt to move his hand, and note that the ball was not travelling quickly. OBJECTIVELY, that is "intentional", and I don't have to get into his mind as to whether he "meant" to do it.

In longshadow's defense, a great deal of refereeing in soccer consists of judgement calls. In this case, as per the FIFA article I referenced in #94, the question for the referee is basically "was the ball moving to the hand, or was the hand moving to the ball?" And then the subjective judgement of the ref really comes into play, because he has to judge whether or not the player gained some advantage by the handball. In this case, he clearly did, as the ball was prevented from entering the goal, but if that same play occurs away from the goal, then the referee is probably making the right call by letting play continue, assuming there is no advantage gained by the handball.

Really, for calls like that, context and advantage are everything when it comes to making the call. And those are inherently subjective judgements. That being said, the ref blew the call - clearly, by preventing the ball from entering the goal, the player gained an advantage, and a penalty kick should have been awarded. However, as it was clearly unintentional, no card should have been issued - intentionally preventing the ball from entering the goal with your hands is a red-card offense.

And finally, in defense of the referee, the replay clearly showed what happened, so I can only assume that both the ref and the linesman were blocked by other players and missed the call. That's not much of a defense - their job is to be in the right position to make those calls in the first place - but that's likely what happened....

145 posted on 06/21/2002 3:24:42 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: baseballfanjm
Does the ball merely have to break the line of the goal as in American football, or does it actually have to go into the goal?
146 posted on 06/21/2002 3:26:03 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Brazil beat England 2-1. I'm looking for Brazil and Germany in the final, and for Germany to take the Cup.

I hope you're right but I watched the England/Brazil match and Brazil looks like a handful. I was rooting for England, returning the favor for quite a few Brits rooting for the USA, and sadly it appeared after Brazil scored the equalizer in stoppage time before the half, the English stopped pressing. Even with a man advantage for 30 minutes or so, it looked like Brazil was on the power play.

I think the US played Germany far stronger than England played Brazil. Maybe it was the heat, maybe that Brazil is just too much, but I feel sorry for England that they lost on that free kick goal that was the equivalent of kicking the ball into a large garbage pail from 25 yards out.

147 posted on 06/21/2002 3:27:48 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
You ansered my question. I think it should be a goal if any part of the ball breaks the line. It's too damned hard to score as the rules now stand.
148 posted on 06/21/2002 3:28:58 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
This is the way I could interpret the call:

Frings was in his defensive position on the near post, with his arms down along his body. You do not have to move your arm, as you would not have to move your arm guarding your groin or face in the blocking wall. The ball hit his arm as he was in a defensive position. No whistle.

In the discussion over in the Kicker.de forum someone made the point that Frings didn't move the arm, even reflexively. Either he is an extremely cool cucumber or he didn't see it.

Also, people have stated that the play was blown off before all that because Kahn was obstructed in the 5 meter area. That would make the question moot.

I think the consensus from the Germans on the game is that the US played very, very well and Germany kept their poise and scored the goal. The better team didn't necessarily win, but the German patience and tactics paid off for them.

Without a doubt, without Oli Kahn, the US wins.

The other issue I've seen here about Ahn, the Korean player who shot the golden goal against Italy, then lost his job, has been pretty well refuted IMHO. The owner of FC Perugia, the Italian side is apparently a "Margie Schott" type. Sports' reporters like to 'unload' on him and embellished some quotes from both sides to create an issue. Factually, Ahn made 1.5 million last year riding the bench. His contract runs out June 30 and he was going to be released anyway. It seems the club helped Ahn a great deal with his career, and Ahn understands the situation.

longjack

149 posted on 06/21/2002 3:30:55 PM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
It's also common for an American football team to be outplayed by its opponent except on the scoreboard.
150 posted on 06/21/2002 3:32:04 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
What next? Long threads on FR about the Pro Bowlers' tour?

That is cute. The 64 games of the World Cup will be watched by a combined 42 billion people. The final will have over 2 billion people watching. This is not the tiddly wink championship of Deer Spit Michigan.

It's not your cup of tea, fine. Just allow those of us who are passionate about the sport, to enjoy it for a few moments ok?

151 posted on 06/21/2002 3:33:57 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: cahergowan
Could have an answer to most of your points but will settle for only one. Do you really doubt that the opponents in the World Series are not the world's best baseball teams? Some would say cuba's team's are better, but I doubt if they would win a seven game series against the champion NA/AL teams.
152 posted on 06/21/2002 3:37:00 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
The entire ball has to break the plane of the back of the line
153 posted on 06/21/2002 3:38:15 PM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
USA vs. Barcelona Dragons in World Bowl I. Final score: USA 65 Barcelona 3.

Considering the fact that the vast majority of players on the Barcelona Dragons roster are American, you would basically end up with one American team beating another American team to win "World Bowl I".

154 posted on 06/21/2002 3:40:59 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Benrand
Ahhh, soccer is for short small weasels.

It could be any time now when we hear of a NFL player tipping the scales at over 400 pounds, or has it already happened? With the average NFL linemen getting fatter, er, bigger every year, I'm waiting for the day when NFL teams start signing Japanese sumo wrestlers to play linemen positions in the NFL.

155 posted on 06/21/2002 3:48:44 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
I don't know why you should be so threatened by the fact someone doesn't hang on every second of World Cup soccer. In fact, my original post wasn't to you, or even to the person who posted the article, but to another poster who views soccer the same as I do: boring.

Enjoy the finals.

156 posted on 06/21/2002 3:49:26 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I don't know why you should be so threatened by the fact someone doesn't hang on every second of World Cup soccer. In fact, my original post wasn't to you, or even to the person who posted the article, but to another poster who views soccer the same as I do: boring.

You miss my point. Feel free to find it boring. It is like going onto a x-files discussion group and telling everybody the show stinks. Going up to a group of Rolling Stones fans and telling them that their music stinks. It is tacky. That is what bugs me. Start your own thread of the he-man we hate soccer club. Be my guest. Just don't rain on our parade. That is my point.

157 posted on 06/21/2002 4:00:34 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
I did not see the match, but from the article, it appears to have been an inadvertant/unintentional handball. If so, it is not illegal and the referee was correct in not awarding a penalty kick. Just one of the breaks of the game.

Not according to this former 3 time World Cup champion(see below).
And I also saw the handball after watch many replays of it. I concluded it was intentional. The defense player only had to move his arm a few inches to the left, deflecting the spinning balls path that kept it out of the net.

Beckenbauer: Germany lucky to win

Updated: Friday June 21, 2002 10:49 a.m. ET

BERLIN (Reuters) -- Former Germany captain and coach Franz Beckenbauer said that the three-times winners were lucky to beat the United States 1-0 in their World Cup quarter-final on Friday.

"America were clearly the better team for 90 minutes," said Beckenbauer, an analyst for Germany's pay-television network. "We'll have to raise our game considerably after this. Hopefully, good fortunate will remain faithful to us.

Beckenbauer also said Germany were fortunate the referee failed to award the Americans a penalty kick four minutes into the second half when German defender Torsten Frings handled on the line after Oliver Kahn had half-saved a Gregg Berhalter shot.

"It's actually a clear penalty kick when one's hand touches the ball on the goal line," he said. "It should have been a penalty."

Beckenbauer, who helped Germany win the World Cup as a player in 1974 and led them to the title as coach in 1990, said Germany had been passive for long stretches against the Americans.

"I can't explain it," he said. "Leading 1-0 you have to keep trying to penetrate into the other team's defence."

Beckenbauer said even though the Americans had played strongly, Germany would probably not have survived had they faced a more dangerous opponent.

"The opponent wasn't Brazil or England or Argentina," he said. "This was America!"

Copyright 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

158 posted on 06/21/2002 4:06:17 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
But I want to also take you up on the question of "intentionality". The question has to be answered OBJECTIVELY, not subjectively. The German player watched the ball move to his hand (away from his body, protecting the goal space that he couldn't legitimately block with his body or head) and ALLOWED the ball to strike his hand -- he made no attempt to move his hand, and note that the ball was not travelling quickly. OBJECTIVELY, that is "intentional", and I don't have to get into his mind as to whether he "meant" to do it.

If the hand was there first, then by definition of causality, it can't be there with the intention of handling the ball, as the player didn't know the ball was going there before he put his hand in that position. Thus it is not "deliberate" handling of the ball.

Now, I will grant you that if the ball were kicked from mid-field, and you saw it coming and left your hand were it was going, that would be deliberate handling, but in today's game there was very little time for anyone to react, as it was deflected up into his hand from a short distance away.

159 posted on 06/21/2002 4:36:18 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
In that premiere interview Beckenbauer disses the entire German team.

In the same tone, and in the same paragraph Beckenbauer says you can "clearly see Frings hand move to the ball." I've seen a lot of people writing that he didn't move the arm. That's a completly different situation. I don't think he moved his arm.

Beckenbauer is peeing in the wind here.

The most sought-after analyst for German soccer is Guenther Netzer. I've been looking around for what he has to say, but I haven't found it yet.

This is definitely a controversial play. If I'm refereeing I call it a PK. The people defending the call say Frings didn't move his arm, which changes the interpretation.

longjack

160 posted on 06/21/2002 4:43:30 PM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson