Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politics: U.S. clashes with United Nations over war crimes tribunal
http://www.nandotimes.com ^ | June 20, 2002 | By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press

Posted on 06/21/2002 12:37:12 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

Politics: U.S. clashes with United Nations over war crimes tribunal

UNITED NATIONS (June 20, 2002 11:44 p.m. EDT) - The United States is threatening to stop helping with U.N. peacekeeping operations unless U.S. participants are given immunity from the new international war crimes tribunal.

A draft resolution presented by the United States to the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday would exempt peacekeepers from prosecution, and U.S. officials say they won't send Americans on such missions unless they receive that protection.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Thursday that he saw no reason for the United States to stop participating in U.N. peacekeeping operations. He noted that arrangements now stipulate that governments who loan troops to U.N. peacekeeping missions have the responsibility for disciplining the troops and punishing them.

"This is how peacekeeping operations have worked all these years. And so, really, I don't see a problem as far as the peacekeepers are concerned," Annan said.

Critics see the draft resolution as a U.S. effort to undermine the International Criminal Court, which is opposed by the Bush administration. The international pact creating the court takes effect July 1.

Sixty-seven countries have ratified the Rome treaty establishing the court, and there is wide support for it among the 15 Security Council members. Six have ratified the treaty, while six others have signed and plan to ratify it. Even China, which hasn't signed, backs it in principle.

The United States remains the only vocal opponent of the court. Former President Clinton signed the treaty, but it was never ratified by the Senate. In early May, the Bush administration said it wants nothing to do with the treaty or the tribunal itself.

When U.S. deputy ambassador Richard Williamson introduced the draft resolution Wednesday demanding immunity, he said Washington's position would not change.

"We will not put American men or women under the reach of the International Criminal Court while serving in a United Nations peacekeeping operation," he said.

The draft resolution demands that the council grant immunity from arrest and prosecution by the court to all participants in operations established or authorized by the Security Council, not just Americans.

This would apply not only to soldiers in U.N. peacekeeping missions and civilians in U.N. peace-building activities, but to participants in operations authorized by the United Nations such as the NATO-led forces in Bosnia and Kosovo and the international force in Afghanistan.

There are currently more than 700 Americans serving in U.N. missions and thousands in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan.

While the Security Council has approved special tribunals to prosecute serious crimes committed in Rwanda and former Yugoslav states, the International Criminal Court will be the world's first permanent tribunal.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/21/2002 12:37:12 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
If the United States pulled out of the UN it would be a disaster..............for the UN

2 posted on 06/21/2002 1:28:57 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zon
The flip side is it will eventually be a disaster for the US if they do stay in.
3 posted on 06/21/2002 3:51:27 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meenie
I think Bush is aware of the two sides of the same coin as well as the power of fliping it heads up we win they lose.
4 posted on 06/21/2002 9:42:10 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson