Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WND: Who is winning the Net war?
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 6.20.02 | Mandi Steele

Posted on 06/20/2002 7:57:42 AM PDT by mhking

TROUBLE IN THE HOLY LAND
Who's winning the Net war?
Backers of Israelis, Palestinians take battle to Internet


Posted: June 20, 2002


By Mandi Steele

Through the eyes of Israeli sympathizers, the Internet is a haven for those who support Yasser Arafat, the idea of a Palestinian state and Islamist ambitions for world hegemony.

Through the eyes of Arab sympathizers, the Internet is a haven for those who unequivocally support the Jewish state.

No matter who's right, both sides in the debate are taking the war in the Mideast to cyberspace – with plans for new sites and greater efforts at networking.

The Jewish Internet Association was created to provide "truthful, positive information to combat anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli activity on the Internet." Chuck Chriss, president of JIA, says the number of pro-Palestinian sites on the Internet outweighs the number of pro-Israel sites.

"We see many needs in improving the advocacy for Israel," he told WorldNetDaily.

The quantity of Palestinian and Muslim sites isn't the only problem, Chriss explains. The visibility the sites have is another. Chriss says that Internet surfers looking for information on Israel will find anti-Israel sentiment or pro-Palestinian propaganda "high-up" on search-engine listings. The sites that include pro-Israel or neutral coverage of Palestine-Israel relations don't receive the number of readers pro-Palestinian sites do, says Chriss, so JIA tries to increase the quality, visibility and quantity of information available.

The Electronic Intifada is a pro-Palestinian online publication focused on "the war in the media for a fair representation of the Palestinian point of view." Nigel Parry, co-founder of EI, believes there are "definitely more" pro-Israeli sites available on the Net, disagreeing with Chriss.

Not only are there "far more" Israeli websites, says Parry, but they are better funded, as well. He believes there needs to be higher-quality and better-funded Palestinian sites accessible.

The Freeman Center for Strategic Studies and sites like Palestine Facts and The Search for Truth in the Middle East present a pro-Israel viewpoint and try to combat the anti-Jewish sites "given life by the Internet," said Chriss. Other sites like A Jewish Voice for Peace are more neutral and only ask for both sides of the Israel-Arab conflict to renounce the use of force and violence to bring peace to the Middle East. Chriss says the pro-Israel and neutral websites present "a more balanced point of view."

Including links to news stories, facts and statistics on the Middle East conflict, JIA attempts to represent "good" and "responsible" reporting on their site, says Chriss. He believes there are times when the news media seem biased toward Palestinians.

"There seems to be a knee-jerk reaction that's pro-Palestinian, particularly on television," he said.

Televised media is focused on images, like a Palestinian kid throwing a rock at an Israeli tank, says Chriss. He explains that often the images are taken out of context and viewers don't get the full story of what's really going on. Many times, Chriss says, the clashes are the result of terrorist incidents, and innocents who are killed by Israelis unfortunately get "caught in the crossfire" of military operations. Many news reports don't dig deep enough to bring out the real analysis of the situation, he says, which leads to anti-Israel sentiment.

Parry believes much of the information written by Israeli media and pro-Israel groups includes "no critical thinking." They all have an "Israel can't be wrong" attitude, he says. If someone gets shot by Israeli troops, Israeli media always say "it must have been a terrorist," he said, because they don't want to think that the Israeli government or soldiers could do anything wrong like shooting an innocent civilian.

"I've seen it," said Parry. "It was a regular occurrence for people, children and young people to be shot."

Living in the Palestinian West Bank from 1994-1998, Parry said he witnessed many clashes between Israel and Palestine.

"The soldiers lives were not in danger. Sometimes they would dance and give each other high fives as they were shooting people," he said.

Any time a news story comes out reporting something the Israelis did wrong, it's labeled biased or anti-Jewish, Parry says.

"If that produces anti-Israeli sentiment, perhaps the issue is not to complain about the coverage," he said, "but to actually address the methods used by the Israeli forces."

The media coverage of the Middle East conflict is "not so black and white," Parry said. He says it's hard to say it's always biased one way or another.

Chriss also said the coverage is "mixed" a lot of the time. He says he tries to find the stories that include truthful representations of the Israel-Palestine situation, because there are many misrepresentations on anti-Israel websites. Sometimes, the facts and statistics given by pro-Palestinian sites and reports are inaccurate, he says.

Though Chriss says he receives some hate e-mail for what JIA is trying to do, he's mostly had a positive response from people.

"In general the reaction's been very positive," he said. "Some of the most encouraging things I've gotten have been e-mails from Israelis who've seen what we're doing and just write to say thank you."

Mandi Steele is an editorial intern for WorldNetDaily.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; terror; websites

1 posted on 06/20/2002 7:57:43 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mhking
A very gloomy article which makes no mention of any of the allied anti-terror hacking alliances. We have dogs on the leash. Just take a look at this google search for "Hackers against terrorism" yields quite a bit of userful info.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Hackers+against+terrorism

2 posted on 06/20/2002 8:10:32 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I believe just surfing some of these sites may arouse enough suspicion to warrant a knock on your door from Tom Ridge and Reichland Security boys.
3 posted on 06/20/2002 8:12:21 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
The links above are search results from the google search engine and are comprised mainly of new coverage.

Lay of the soma. ;)
4 posted on 06/20/2002 8:52:51 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freemeorkillme
TightSqueeze, apologies. I thought you were in the "New Posts to You" link. Whoops. Think I need more coffee.
5 posted on 06/20/2002 8:54:14 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The posting of propaganda does not make a "automatic win" in the Net war. Funny how reporters think that their words define reality, instead of just report their view of it. The win or loose in the propaganda war is if people belive what you say. The forum here is a good example of what is actualy happening in that war. Here you can comment and argue the point, not just post it and hide behind the print. The course of the argument shows the win or loose of the point.

Clearly the lies of the Arab League and its puppet, the Islamic forward troops on European Soil, is holding little weight with the pragmatic view of reality that Americans have. It is hard to argue philosophy against blown up city busses and schools. Action speaks louder than words in America, where in Europe form over substance rules the day.

There is a war out there and here for the minds and souls of mankind. Someone who will side with cold blooded murders against a free and productive people, just for the sake of the philosophy of socialism or a religion of murder and conquest has already lost their soul, for them the battle is over.

In such a battle of horror, there are few fence sitters when the smoke clears. This is a good thing, mankind has been sleeping and allowing evil in the name of "diversity" far too long. I don't mind diversity when it means freedom to be who you are, I hate those who use diversity to murder, steal and corrupt. Those who use freedom to enslave others have abandoned their rights to that freedom that they so despise. To allow evil to prosper is to have a part in that evil.

God said that in the last days he would Judge the Nations of the world by making Jerusalem a stumbling stone. He also said that any Nation that burdened it self to move that stone He would destroy. Bush needs to read his Bible, for to call for Jerusalem to become an Islamic Capitol of a foriegn State is calling the Wrath of God apon our heads.

Well, currently I am not in Jerusalem, I am home in California. I hope to be home in Jerusalem soon. Strange to be homesick for two places at once...

Blessings to ya all, keep up the good fight for Justice and Truth. These things are pleasing to God, the ultimate Lurker of Free Republic...

6 posted on 06/20/2002 10:25:20 AM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson