Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Search for Scapegoats
Washington Post ^ | June 19, 2002 | Robert J. Samuelson

Posted on 06/19/2002 5:07:15 PM PDT by liberallarry

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:40 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Since its peak in March 2000, the stock market has lost about a third of its value, or almost $6 trillion, according to Wilshire Associates. Everyone would like to think that these immense losses -- painful to individual investors and possibly threatening to the economy -- are someone else's fault. And now, suitable culprits seem to have emerged: Wall Street and corporate America, whose greed and dishonesty allegedly rigged the market.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: scapegoats; stockmarketbubble
Don't forget Greespan's "irrational exuberance", those who criticized him, and the reasons they gave.
1 posted on 06/19/2002 5:07:15 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
I blame Bill Clinton. His spinners were over praising the economy to deflect attention from his crimes. parsy.
2 posted on 06/19/2002 5:13:08 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
"I blame Bill Clinton. His spinners were over praising the economy to deflect attention from his crimes. parsy."

Do not forget their efforts to keep bubble inflating (e.g. in the spring of 1998), I suppose that it could make a nice topic for investigation on the Hill.

3 posted on 06/19/2002 5:20:59 PM PDT by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry; parsifal; alex; Poohbah; Orual; aculeus
Good post.

It's always easier to blame THEM for bad investments, than one's own greed, wishful thinking, and lack of sense.

As you mentioned, Greenspan took tremendous heat for daring to mention "irrational exuberance." He was quite correct.

Regarding Clinton: I don't doubt that he did everything in his power to encourage the bubble. His popularity depended on it. Nevertheless, people *wanted* to believe a load of pleasant nonsense.

4 posted on 06/19/2002 5:37:17 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Since its peak in March 2000, the stock market has lost about a third of its value, or almost $6 trillion

I go to Vegas with $10,000. I run it up to $100k and then lose most of it. I go home with only $5,000.

Have I lost $95,000 or $5,000?

Simplified, that is the story of the Great Tech Bubble. Most of the money that was "lost" never existed in any real sense.

5 posted on 06/19/2002 5:37:50 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Pleasant nonsense is fun.

My stock broker told me to buy.
Said the market was gonna go high.
So I did it with glee
At a hundred P E.
And a negative R zero I.
6 posted on 06/19/2002 5:44:18 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Don't forget Greespan's "irrational exuberance", those who criticized him, and the reasons they gave.

What old "Boom and Bust" Greenspan said and what he did are two different things. While he was warning about irrational exuberance, he was pumping cheap money into the system -- under the cover of preparing for Y2K. I knew Y2K was a hoax and so did many other informed people. You make up your own mind as to what Greenspan was up to. Later, if you remember, Greenspan attacked average Americans who he thought had become "too prosperous." Lot'sa big bankers and Wall Street types made millions on the bubble. Greenspan burst the bubble and now the too prosperous average American working stiffs are going to pay the price. Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and he takes care of his friends.

Richard W.

7 posted on 06/19/2002 5:46:35 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
I knew Y2K was a hoax and so did many other informed people.

Y2K, had no remediation work been performed, would have had consequences ranging from the trivial (incorrectly displayed or sorted dates) to the catastrophic (data disappearing or systems crashing). It was not by any means a hoax.

Much of the tech boom was fueled by Y2K remediation work. The work ended, and so did the boom.

8 posted on 06/19/2002 7:18:49 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
I blame Bill Clinton. His spinners were over praising the economy to deflect attention from his crimes. parsy.

Back when the stock market was at its peak, I said then that it was all an illusion, a soap-bubble castle held up largely by a lot of hot air from Clinton and his BS-spinning machine.

9 posted on 06/19/2002 7:35:46 PM PDT by john in missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson