Skip to comments.
Home Economics: Lies, damned lies, and gaps
National Review Online ^
| 6/19/02
| Roger Clegg
Posted on 06/19/2002 10:07:48 AM PDT by browardchad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: browardchad
What an awesome job the government has, making this a perfect world.
2
posted on
06/19/2002 10:13:27 AM PDT
by
chit*chat
To: browardchad
In my experience, minorities who own homes are more interested in being involved in their communities, more likely to marry and far more likely to slip the bondage of the Democratic party and become Conservatives.
3
posted on
06/19/2002 10:14:50 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
To: TC Rider
Be Careful, talk like that will get you branded as a SGR...
(From the other thread on this subject...)
I don't know what a "Sodomized Goat Republican" is, but I guess I do identify as a RINO shill.
Remember the "Broken Glass Republicans" who would supposedly crawl over a field of broken glass to get to the polls on election day and vote for Bush? I was one of them as probably were you. I've come up with a similar term to describe some of the Republicans I've encountered here on Free Republic and elsewhere. A "Sodomized Goat Republican(tm)" is a Republican who, if George Bush was to go on national TV and sodomize a goat, would immediately applaud and defend the action as part of Bush's grand plan to obtain more support for the war effort and to win over the sodomite/pervert/deviant vote in the next election cycle so that the Republicans would regain the majority in the Senate. And Miss Marple, the SGR poster child, would find some reference to goat sodomy in a Bush campaign or acceptance speech and be on here telling us how we knew he was going to sodomize the goat, it was a campaign promise, and that all of us mean misogynists should just shut up.
4
posted on
06/19/2002 10:21:35 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: browardchad
In an even more alarming statistic, nearly 99% of those Americans under the age of 18 don't own their own homes. Isn't there something that can be done?
Stop the injustice!
5
posted on
06/19/2002 10:21:57 AM PDT
by
tcostell
To: tcostell
In an even more alarming statistic, nearly 99% of those Americans under the age of 18 don't own their own homes. Isn't there something that can be done?A down-payment as a birthright perhaps?
To: hobbes1
That's a great quote, and right on the money, too. Who authored it? You really ought to ping him/her.
To: Rodney King; Spiff
I believe Spiff, But I am not sure...
It's balderdash BTW...lol
8
posted on
06/19/2002 10:47:43 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: sneakypete
Did you write the quote in #4?
To: TC Rider
In my experience, minorities who own homes are more interested in being involved in their communities, more likely to marry and far more likely to slip the bondage of the Democratic party and become Conservatives.Oh, with experience like that, you must live in the southwest region of the United States.
Thanks for that bit of knowledge gained by experience.
To: TC Rider
In my experience, minorities who own homes are more interested in being involved in their communities, more likely to marry and far more likely to slip the bondage of the Democratic party and become Conservatives. I would tend to agree. However, the people who you have observed all EARNED their home ownership. The outcome might not be the same for the welfare homeowners that Bush will create.
To: TC Rider
In my experience, minorities who own homes are more interested in being involved in their communities, more likely to marry and far more likely to slip the bondage of the Democratic party and become Conservatives.We have now ventured into a key aspect of statistical analysis: causation. Here is an important concept: correlation does not prove causation. For example, whenever I take my umbrella to work, my shoes get wet. There is a correlation, but clearly common sense tells us that taking an umbrella does not cause rain. There is a third factor involved in this example (e.g., I observe a weather report or notice dark clouds). In your example, I would argue that you have causation backwards: Minorities who have conservative values are more likely to make the effort to own a home. Just because we give a liberal a home will not make that person more likely to be conservative.
12
posted on
06/19/2002 11:04:06 AM PDT
by
Stat-boy
To: Rodney King; Stat-boy
Again, that was just my observation, not valid for scientific studies. (and trailers don't count)
I haven't read through all of the details of Bush's plan, so won't comment on it, beyond hoping it's not a complete give-away program.
It seems I heard somewhere that 'habitat4humanity' homes have a huge default rate.
13
posted on
06/19/2002 11:28:49 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
To: hobbes1
baaa?
14
posted on
06/19/2002 11:29:20 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
To: TC Rider
I hope I did not come across as a pompous jerk. If I did, I apologize. I did not hear about the H4H data, but years ago I read about interesting studies on people who win lotteries...many whos finances were in disorder before the windfall reverted back to that same state not long afterwards. Maybe when I have time I will look for info on the net.
15
posted on
06/19/2002 11:38:05 AM PDT
by
Stat-boy
To: Stat-boy
No problem. I agree that giving homes to liberals is a bad thing. Unless of course they are homes in Stalingrad, Havana or North Korea.*
*Offer valid only to current US citizens, offer void except where prohibited by law. If your name is Alec Baldwin, you may already be a winner!
16
posted on
06/19/2002 11:58:08 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
To: browardchad
Not only the government, but the private sector, must be mobilized "in a major nationwide effort to increase minority ownership."Why?
To: hobbes1
Only if it's a really handsome goat.
To: browardchad
This is the sign of a man whose party has gone over the 2000 election numbers six ways from Sunday. If the Republicans don't soak up some minority/Hispanic votes, they believe, they'll be sunk. This is pure vote-pandering.
To: valkyrieanne
yo say that like the is something wrong with it.
There are only two ways to get around it, 1. Get a dictator. And have no elections or 2.wave your magic wand and make the sheeple wake up to the Dems intransigence...
Given the unpalatable flavor of the first and the sheer fantasy of the second, looks like we're stuck with pandering for now..
20
posted on
06/19/2002 12:24:33 PM PDT
by
hobbes1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson