Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norplant Nightmare: An American Victim of Family Planning
Population Research Institute ^ | June 18, 2002 | Steve Mosher

Posted on 06/19/2002 8:17:37 AM PDT by toenail

 
18 June 2002
Vol. 4 Number 13

Dear Colleague:

Countless numbers of women overseas have been abused by family planning programs. But victims of family planning also abound in the U.S. Take the case of Norplant. Despite its sometimes extreme side effects, and the payment of $54 million to settle a class action lawsuit, Norplant manufacturer Weyeth-Ayerst (now Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) continues to deny its health risks. Moreover, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to carry Norplant on its list of approved drugs and devices, as an approved substance for regulating pregnancy. Abortion groups continue to aggressively promote Norplant as a safe and effective means of contraception. And American women, deprived of full information about the health risks of Norplant, continue to suffer.

Steve Mosher
President

Norplant Nightmare: An American Victim of Family Planning

Norplant was developed and manufactured by contraception mogul Weyeth-Ayerst Laboratories (now Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) during the 1980s.
Drug trials were carried out in the developing world, first in Chile during the 1960s, then later in Thailand and elsewhere.(1) Sadly, it is cheaper to use women in the developing world as guinea pigs, than the real thing back in the United States.

Responding to a request from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), in 1985, the World Health Organization (WHO) ignored its health risks and concluded that Norplant is an “effective… long-term method of family planning,” and the International Planned Parenthood Federation included Norplant in its arsenal of population control methods for its international affiliates.(2) It was approved by the FDA in 1991.

FDA approval of Norplant was heavily lobbied in the U.S. by Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers, and shortly after the FDA approval, pro-abortion judges and legislators attempted to mandate its use by certain individual women or minority groups of women in the U.S.(3) These attempts at domestic coercion and genocide failed, but Norplant continued to be widely promoted in the U.S. largely by withholding information about its severe health risks from the public forum. But not long after its induction into U.S. markets, American women began to report horrendous side effects, such as headaches, weight gain, and blindness.

In response, PRI launched a massive petition drive to the FDA to revoke Norplant approval and to pull Norplant from U.S. markets. Unfortunately, to this day, Norplant remains FDA approved, and Planned Parenthood continues to tout it as “one of the most effective… methods of birth control available in the U.S.”—noting little more than temporary discomfort as a potential side effect.(4)

In 1999 Norplant maker Wyeth-Ayerst agreed to pay a reported $54 million to more than 36,000 women who had sued, charging that their health had been impaired by Norplant. And on August 10, 2000, Wyeth-Ayerst issued a letter to doctors to stop inserting implants that were shipped after October 1999 with expiration dates of 2004.

While Wyeth has admitted that Norplant may be an ineffective method of contraception, it refuses to either discontinue its promotion or warn women of the risks. In fact, during a recent interview with PRI, Weyeth stated that it “was working with the FDA to get around this problem” of having manufactured “ineffective” supplies, but plans to continue promoting Norplant in the U.S.(5)

In this context, PRI received the following testimony from an American victim of Norplant:

In April, 1993, I received a Norplant implant. The doctor warned me only of mild headaches and possibly a little weight gain. Immediately after the implant, I stopped having periods. I went from 89 lbs. to 170 lbs. in 2 months. In 1994, I began having extremely bad headaches and my vision rapidly deteriorated. Because of my deteriorating health, I had the Norplant removed. I had to be cut 4 times to find all the tubes.

I have never recovered. In 1996, I had a two-day period, then became pregnant. My daughter was born at 24 weeks because of complications. She was born with severe health problems. In 1997, I began growing hair on my stomach, back, chest and face. I also began to have problems with my heart. I'm too heavy and it's putting strain on my heart. Today, I am a full blood diabetic.

In 1999 I started having seizures. I sometimes have 3 to 4 a day. My seizures have kept me from working, driving, or even being unsupervised for long periods of time. I’m now 28 and I haven’t had a period since 1993.

I have stomach pains and pains in my heart on a daily basis. I continue to grow hair at a fast pace. My seizures are getting worse. I don't know what to do.

At this point, I am very weak. I have trouble walking to my mailbox or even around the yard. I have days were I can't leave the house because the sun will give me a headache. Recently, my bladder began to leak urine into my stomach. I have scheduled an appointment for surgery.

I need help. I want to get better, and just be able to put all this behind me.

Thanks for hearing my story, and I hope you can help.(6)

This woman's story may be horrifying, but it is not rare. Medical experts note that hormonal contraceptives such as Norplant can cause hormonal imbalances that can cause serious side effects. There are undoubtedly many more women in America who are suffering because of present and past Norplant use.

Instead of promoting Norplant, Wyeth and Norplant promoters and distributors should be forced to continue to pay damages. And the FDA should revoke approval for Norplant.

Until then, the problem of Norplant is not going away.

Population Research Institute (PRI) is dedicated to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of “family planning.” In 1998, PRI investigators in Peru documented coercive sterilization and contraception campaigns run by then Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori. This evidence helped lead to the passage of the Tiahrt Amendment – a law designed to end U.S. support for coercive family planning programs overseas.

A key provision of the Tiahrt amendment is to inform women about the health risks associated with methods of contraception in family planning programs supported by U.S. foreign aid.

Unfortunately, throughout the process of developing methods of contraception, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration if often reluctant to admit health risks, especially if American women are seen as potential consumers of contraceptive methods developed largely through experimental trials overseas.

1. University of California at Berkeley, “Norplant: Levonorgestral Implants,” www.csua.berkeley.edu/~monac/norplant.html.
2. Ibid.
3. American Civil Liberties Union, “Norplant: a new contraception with the potential for abuse,” http://www.aclu.org/issues/reproduct/norplant.html.
4. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, “Fact Sheet: Norplant and You,” http://www.plannedparenthood.org/birth-control/norplant.htm.
5. PRI Interview with The Norplant Foundation, Weyeth Pharmaceuticals, June 14, 2002. 6. Testimony provided to PRI May 14, 2002.



Steve Mosher is the president of Population Research Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.


(c) 2001 Population Research Institute.
Permission to reprint granted. Redistribute widely. Credit requested.

To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, send an email to: Mail to: JOIN-PRI@Pluto.Sparklist.Com. To unsubscribe from the Weekly Briefing, please follow the directions at the bottom of this message.
Nothing written here is to be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.

The Population Research Institute is committed to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of "overpopulation."

PRI
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, Virginia USA 22630
Phone: (540) 622-5240 Fax: (540) 622-2728
Email: scott@pop.org
Media Contact: Scott Weinberg (540) 622-5240, ext. 202


PRI Home Page | Briefing Archive

© 2001 by Population Research Institute of all contents at this Web site. PRI News Syndicate. Permission to reprint granted. Redistribute widely. Credit requested.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/19/2002 8:17:37 AM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: toenail
Actually, all medical procedures and ingestible materials present risks.

To live is to play a probabilities game. Inaction can be just as fatal as action. You have to make choices. The government should NOT be the ultimate decision maker, especially in matters of health. At most they should be advisory.

2 posted on 06/19/2002 8:39:34 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Sounds like she had some pre-existing condition that caused her to react badly to the Norplant. And of course all the problems she decribes as arising after the Norplant was removed, arose after she got pregnant and had a baby (and what a great idea to get pregnant and have a baby when she was already having serious health problems). There's nothing here to indicate that she wouldn't have been better off if she HADN'T had it removed. Nor that her post-pregnancy-childbirth health problems wouldn't have occurred even if she had never had the Norplant. This diatribe sounds like the work of someone whose comprehension of science was gleaned from our pathetic public school curriculum -- all feelings, no facts.
3 posted on 06/19/2002 9:02:07 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
I had Norplant for 5 years and had no problems. I thought it was great.
4 posted on 06/19/2002 9:11:34 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
I had a Norplant for the full five years and had absoultly no problems with it. No headaches, weight gain, or mood swings(the mood swings I had while using birth control pills made me a Psycho B----- From Hell).

The only drawback that I can see with the product is that they can't somehow make it to where it isn't five years in length.

5 posted on 06/19/2002 6:47:52 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
I've known several people who have had health problems with Norplant though not as severe as this example. However, my main concern if the unknown long term health risks for women on this drug, as well as potential long term health risks for children born of women who have had this drug. There are so many unknowns and yet this drug is touted as "safe". Anyone who takes is is basically a medical guinea pig IMO.

A better plan to me would be to spend R&D funds to develope safe easily reverisble vasectomies for men. I'm really tired of all these unsafe hormonal methods being "tested" on women when there are viable non-hormonal methods that can be developed which are far less risky long term and have far fewer short term side effects as well.
6 posted on 06/22/2002 3:21:31 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
You advocate surgical sterilization for men...that is perverse. You are one sick chick!
7 posted on 06/22/2002 5:10:04 PM PDT by Just Clark Kent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Just Clark Kent
I advocate safe measures of contraception. Voluntary safe measures. There is nothing "sick" about that.

What is sick is using women as guinea pigs with powerful drugs that we do not know the consequences that will happen to women later.
8 posted on 06/24/2002 11:37:23 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
You very easily dismiss your tendency to put the onus exclusively on men by citing concern's about women's health...while cavalierly dismissing men's health issues.
9 posted on 07/05/2002 5:34:18 PM PDT by Just Clark Kent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Just Clark Kent
Please reread. I did not put the onus "exclusively on men" nor did I dismiss men's health concerns.

Saying a hormonal treatments for women have unknown long term future healt consequences for women is not dismissive of men.

However, it is a medical fact that vasectomy is safer than other surgeries such as tubal ligation, and abortion. In addition vasectomy has a much lower death and injury rate than childbirth. Therefore, it would make sense to research reversible vasectomy techniques as this is already safer than other surgical methods.

With hormonal treatements we just don't know yet the long term consequences. Hormonal contraceptives for men are already in development and I would have the same concerns about those.

Unfortunately, there is a downside to all contraceptive techniques. We need to make contraceptives as safe as possible. However, as they all involve some risks (or inconvenience in the case of condoms) I do not advocate that one sex take all the health/medical risks, particularly when those risks are much greater than say vasectomy.
12 posted on 07/05/2002 6:20:35 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson