Did you also notice...
This past weekend, what was the internet blitz? Padilla/OKCJohnDoe what was the mainmedia blitz? Nixon bad/Deep Throat still unknown.
Which of the 2 blitzes is, in reality, the more important of the two? ------------------------------------------------------------
Tom, you are right on target here. Last week and weekend, my wife was trying to find something to watch on our Dish Tv menu. She commented about all the Watergate stuff being advertised and showing.
I told her that it was the anniversary of Watergate, but that whenever something was potentially embarrassing for the Rats and the Clintoons, they had the Watergate stuff in the closet ready to go with. This is done to get their perverted dark side voting cult members to focus on the minor crimes of Nixon to forget the real big crimes of the Clintoons!
We also need to publicly identify the dems' M.O. whenever they are in mid-lie:
Since many of them remain prominent in Washington and in politics, it is likely we will see these tactics again. They begin with outright denial. As events unfold, the overall denial is maintained while that which has become public is back-handedly acknowledged and its importance minimized. After the initial intensity dissipates, the allegations are recast, embellished and once again denied -- sometimes accompanied by a demand for an apology or claim of vindication.Then, many months down the road when the full truth is known, the discussion is changed to one of how ridiculous the whole business was and how outrageously expensive and political the investigation of the allegations are -- while only tacitly if at all admitting that which was alleged was substantively true.
[snip]
What we did hear were complaints from Clinton allies like Paul Begala, speaking on Crossfire, that spending $200,000 to uncover $20,000 worth of damage in the White House was an outrageous waste of the taxpayer's money.
Maybe so. But how much would it have cost if they had just told the truth in the first place?