Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jadimov
Please explain how Mexican water rights affect San Diego County.

... the All-American Canal, which since 1944 has transported water from the Colorado River westward into California's Imperial Valley, helping turn a desolate and arid wasteland into a $1-billion-a-year farm economy.

The canal's operator, the Imperial Irrigation District, says it will soon begin a project to reline a porous 23-mile section of the canal, converting it from clay to concrete. That would save the vast amounts of water lost to seepage ...

The stakes are high. Seepage totaling as much as 2% of all the water transported from the Colorado River to the Imperial Valley has brought prosperity to the northeast Mexicali Valley, which is what the Imperial Valley is called south of the border. Losing it would create economic, social and environmental problems, Baja officials warn.

~~~~~

"We are concerned with any possibility of significant reduction of what we receive from the Colorado River," Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castaneda said Friday. "That's where we get our water from."

~~~~~

California officials say that the lining project violates neither the letter nor spirit of the binational water agreement and that asking Southern California not to line the canal so that the water can continue to seep out and aid the Mexicali Valley is asking too much.

For one thing, the irrigation district has paid for the water that Mexican farmers are using, state officials said, according to a formula under the 1944 treaty. The agreement calls for Mexico to receive 1.5 million acre-feet of water, roughly one-third of what California gets.

~~~~~

U.S. officials note that along with receiving its full allocation under the 1944 treaty, Mexico also receives about 200,000 acre-feet a year because of problems with a storage facility in Imperial County--water that, like the canal seepage, they say belongs to the U.S.

2% loss isn't much, but when you see SD, LA, and the Imperial Valley planting acres of non-native flora that are water intensive for cultivation, the loss of millions of acre/feet per year makes a bad situation worse.
14 posted on 06/17/2002 7:56:34 PM PDT by brityank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: brityank
Think about this. Mexicali a city of two million just South of the US border has no plumbed water supply. Tanker trucks fill up in the US and deliver water to the city. In addition it's sewage dumps into the New River and ends up in the Salton Sea. One hundred ten degrees and no water. Amazing.
22 posted on 06/17/2002 9:30:14 PM PDT by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: brityank
2% loss isn't much, but when you see SD, LA, and the Imperial Valley planting acres of non-native flora that are water intensive for cultivation, the loss of millions of acre/feet per year makes a bad situation worse. 2% loss isn't much, but when you see SD, LA, and the Imperial Valley planting acres of non-native flora that are water intensive for cultivation, the loss of millions of acre/feet per year makes a bad situation worse.

If you eat lettuce, cauliflour, broccoli, cabbage, asparagas, and a variety of other fruits, and vegtables in the winter, it was grown in these water intensive areas, irrigated with Colorado River Water. Don't complain unless you are prepared to give them for half the year.

32 posted on 06/18/2002 12:28:25 AM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: brityank
California should tell Mexico to pay fair market value for the free water it has been receiving. It Mexico refuses, California should start the anti-seepage projects.
36 posted on 06/18/2002 8:02:37 AM PDT by jadimov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson