No. I did not. Ahban persists in claiming that because I think I can compress the data, that I am really offering to write code because, I guess, "oh, it's just all so complicated and intertwined". Don't put Ahban's words in my mouth. At no time did I volunteer that the DNA code operated like a program--it emphatically does not, as I long-windedly explained just previously.
Well sure, it is "like" a program in a number of ways. It is discrete, it is read in serial order. However, this does not constitute carte blanche for you to go off on a wild hair.
151 posted on 6/26/02 12:40 PM Pacific by donh
Now you say:
No. I did not.
Yes, now that you see that with all your saying that you could do better than God at writing code (which you have been saying for dozens of posts with me and Abhan) you are trying to get out of the pit you got yourself into. It is a program only if you can say you are smarter than who wrote it (which anyways is total nonsense - you do not compress running programs which is the stupid statement you have been making showing very well you do not know beans about programming).
So I repeat my question - how do you rewrite a program at random? You cannot and that is why you are running away from all your previous statements. The DNA code is proof that organisms are intelligently designed because no program has ever been written by random means by non-intelligent methods.