Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnBerger; Fred Mertz
That article in the Washington Post on Sunday did call the bomb in Karachi a "fertilizer bomb." But that need not mean the bomb only contained fertilizer (indeed, I don't believe fertilizer by itself would explode). People claiming expertise on explosives have claimed an ANFO (ammonium nitrate fertilizer plus fuel oil) bomb would not have done the damage the OKC bomb did. I am no expert on explosives, and thus cannot confirm this claim, but, if it is true, it is presumably equally true of the bomb in Karachi.

I strongly suspect the Karachi, OKC, and East African embassy bombs all contained the mixture of ammonium nitrate, TNT, and nitroglycerine detailed on that notebook page entitled "Explosivija za Oklahomu" (Serbo-Croatian for "Explosive Used in Oklahoma") found at the house in Kabul last year. I strongly suspect such a mixture would have had the stronger secondary blast that apparently occurred at least in the OKC and East African bombings. Does anybody know if there was such a secondary blast in Karachi?

232 posted on 06/25/2002 1:59:10 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
This is the reference on the bomb that I was citing from:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/st ory.hts/world/1466585/

Nothing in there about a seconday blast, but it does specifify it was the same type of bomb as in OKC.
234 posted on 06/25/2002 2:08:36 PM PDT by JohnBerger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson