Replies

Spirited, yes, but Sperry draws on leaps of logic as much as the Luray loonies he cites. The body was found nine months after police supposedly searched the area. The body is possibly found bound and the bones scattered around on the side of a hill. Might be the fate of a body decaying for a year or it may be a body hastily "planted" after the heat was off.

And I have problems with the alleged prime suspect who was so inept at sneaking up on women that his last two got away. And why were no personal belongings removed from Chandra if the perp had a thing for Walkmen? I'm yet to be convinced.

The dodge that Condit was "trying to hide evidence of an affair" is just the tip of the iceberg. He misled Chandra's parents and stonewalled the press for months. It took three interviews before the police got him to fess up to the affair. And who can forgrt the "creepy" interview with Connie Chung?

I'm not sure the Luray angle had anything to do with Chandra's death but I'm less convinced some stalker-killer got worse at his M.O. as he gained more experience at it.

I'm not ready to let Condit off the hook. But Sperry is right about one thing - for the media it was all one big tittilating ratings-grabber to make up for the non-intern-abusing occupant in the White House. The media just can't keep their minds out of the gutter.

And if Todd Fahey is still lurking (I doubt it), nice job, loony tune!

First, Ingmar Guandeque had no interest in walkman's. He was always after the women.

Second, the fate of the last two victims for which he is in jail is due only to luck plus resistance. If he tackled Chandra off the path like victim #2, she may never have had a chance to give effective resistance.