Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpl
Relax, he's blowing smoke up your ass. Now, if you were a bartender, on the other hand...
27 posted on 06/17/2002 7:02:49 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: all
I would also remind all on this thread, that IT WAS CONDIT who brought Luray into the Levy discussion, by actually going there and BEING THERE, on the first day in the whole session when he ever missed a vote! (5-17-01)

"WE" do not have to explain Luray;--- CONDIT does! "EYE" wasn't in Luray, Condit was! Luray wasn't invented as some wild-eyed fiction in the mind of someone out to get Condit-- IT ENTERED THE DISCUSSION ONLY BECAUSE HE ACTUALLY WENT THERE.

It is the Conditista side that must explain it away, and one reason some wild ideas got bandied about, is because the Condit side has never come forward with Word One about it. Not one word, not one hint. Luray is not imaginary, friends. It does exist, and Condit was there. And he will not explain what he was doing, something pretty important to spoil one of the best attendance records in Congress!

One could also note in passing, that when the Levy family came to DC to start the PR ball rolling in their own campaign to find out what happened to Chandra, for some reason they did so with a kickoff quite far out in the Virginia suburbs, (from 5-15- to 5-19-01 IIRC) this despite Chandra's having both lived and worked only in the District.

They could easily have done this, and got if anything more attention and better news coverage, in DC itself, but for some reason it was done quite far out into the Va. suburbs. Why?

28 posted on 06/17/2002 7:32:01 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson