Mine is that prohibitions on guns, - or drugs, violate the constitution. - Why your 'stance' is otherwise is beyond logic. - 321 by tpaine
So, your problem is making a distinguishment between guns and drugs?
Not my problem, obviously, -- that example is directed at YOUR misapplied stance. - Learn to read.
Let me refer you to the second amendment. If, indeed prohibition of all substances and property were forbidden by the USC, why, then, would the second amendment be required?
The history of the BOR's is freely available. You need the study, fer sure.