Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allend
It is a standard accusation, patently absurd, originally made by the pagan Romans back in the first or second century, and more recently taken up by a certain variety of self-styled "Bible fundamentalists."

The Eucharist is not ritual cannibalism?

Isn't it the ritual consumption of the blood and body of Christ?

Isn't the doctrine of transubstantiation a support of an even more literal interpretation of this assertion?

I have no objection to Catholics (or any other religious sects) engaging in this ritual cannibalistic practice. In fact, as I've already stated, I apply my libertarian principles in defense of it (provided rights are not violated).

What part of my position do you object to?

Do you disagree with my assertion that the Eucharist is ritual cannibalism?

If it isn't, then what is it?

35 posted on 06/12/2002 12:34:04 PM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
I think allend is taking issue with your terminology. I don't think you're spouting anti-Catholicism.
37 posted on 06/12/2002 12:36:03 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson