Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
10-20 years. When it starts you will have a lot of new neighbors.

When it starts to happen, one can only hope that we have leaders wise enough to procure some more (warm) territory for the United States.

What is the best candidate? Mexico.

Give them an ultimatum: stop violating our borders. If they reject such as resonable proposal (as they will undoubtedly do, since history tells us that tyrannical government are rarely "reasonable"), we invade and take half of their damn country.

Now, being a compassionate and just people, we should compensate the oppressed Mexican peasants for any "inconvience" they will incur as a result of the previously mentioned events.

I say we give them the entire Northeast United States, and build a wall between that region and the "new" US. This could be done under the guise of "border security", but the REAL reason for it should be to keep the US-born northeastern liberals from leaving the region and contaminating the rest of us.

This solution would kill two birds with one stone.

25 posted on 06/08/2002 11:25:00 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Mulder
The only problem with the Ice Age is the wheat fields in Canada will shut down. At the same time, new land that is now submerged will become above sea level. For example, Australia will become part of mainland Asia. All-in-all we'll come out about even.
26 posted on 06/08/2002 11:31:03 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson