I didn't understand the lines about two freashly painted volkswagon bumbers just inside Westerfields front door, in the testimony I read last night? Was that the lawyer trying to trick the cop into admitting that he'd never been there, or what?
IMO, perhaps that they were less than thorough in their "investigation". I believe the bumpers in question were the son's, could be wrong though. The son was said to have been in residence that weekend. Why didn't they search the home with the son there? Hhmmm.
Point was LE was very selective in what information they documented. SURPRISE!!