To: spectre
That's where I'm having a problem too.....DW has asked BDV to intro him to her friend, says he hosts adult parties, of the 68,000 images on his puter, non are pre pubescent...nothing has been stated so far that he ever tried to get close to Danielle or any other child??
Another problem is how would DW know enuf about BVD lifestyle to say he hosts adult parties...if they only briefly talked while selling cookies....and you're right...why not say I host family parties..bring the kids!!...it just doesn't track for me.
163 posted on
06/09/2002 3:00:47 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: Rheo
another question.....when are they alleging that DW went into the house to get Danielle?
164 posted on
06/09/2002 3:07:32 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: Rheo
Well, remember the prosecution's claims that Westerfield could see into the back yard from his bathroom window? Their point was that he could watch the children play in the back yard--but I wonder if he wasn't watching the adults "play" in the hot tub--also in the back yard.
To: Rheo;theirjustdue;MizSterious
Don't know why there is so much emphasis on the Pizza by the van Dams? It seems to be playing a major role in their testimony, tho. Who knows what these people were really eating, drinking, smoking or doing.
DW had plenty of previous opportunities to snatch Danielle if he wanted to...so WHY that particular date?
Can't help but contrast the Smart family of Salt Lake to the van Dams and it's like comparing apples to oranges..
sw
168 posted on
06/09/2002 3:25:48 PM PDT by
spectre
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson