Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
It's meant to justify actions which were not otherwise justifiable

LOL. States' rights is just what you describe, as anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of history knows. The South seceded because their leaders wanted out. They had wanted out for a long time. Some of them never really wanted in. They never liked the Constitution. Patrick Henry was a typical slaver. He acknowledged early on that the Constituion spelled doom for slavery. He professed to hate slavery, but he practiced it, and thought it "imprudent" that it ever--ever--be abolished. It was men like him who seized whatever excuse was handy to try and destroy our government.

25 posted on 06/08/2002 3:35:10 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
You didn't answer the question.
30 posted on 06/08/2002 4:13:54 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Some called it a necessary "evil"....even though they practiced it. I disagree with many on this forum from the Northern perspective. I believe it would have died out on it's own within 50 years or so. The parallel demise of the institution in the Americas bears this out in my view.

That is why the war was not strictly about slavery. It was just another incorporation of a region of the country into the Federalized Union. Sort of a rock rolling down a hill...the momentum carried the day....and the foolishness of many.

32 posted on 06/08/2002 6:57:49 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson