[Huck]

Good. Let these retards argue amongst themselves for a while.

modern libertarian revival

LOL.

[Huck]

LOL. This article is so stupid I can't stop laughing. It reminds me of the People's Front of Judea in Monty Python's Life of Brian:

STAN:

I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me 'Loretta'.

REG:

What?!

LORETTA:

It's my right as a man.

JUDITH:

Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?

LORETTA:

I want to have babies.

REG:

You want to have babies?!

LORETTA:

It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.

REG:

But... you can't have babies.

LORETTA:

Don't you oppress me.

REG:

I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb! Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!

LORETTA:

[crying]

JUDITH:

Here! I-- I've got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans', but that he can have the right to have babies.

FRANCIS:

Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.

REG:

What's the point?

FRANCIS:

What?

REG:

What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?!

FRANCIS:

It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.

REG:

Symbolic of his struggle against reality.

[Demidog]

The Cato institute has been doing its best to repudiate libertarian ideas lately. The idea that secession was in essence "kidnapping" is silly. In order to believe that theory you have to assume that the slaves were somehow being taken away from the Union. The Union didn't want the slaves and Lincoln was not interested in freeing the slaves. He was attempting to keep the union together for economic reasons.