To: Pokey78
High executive compensation may have nothing to do with current executive performance according to "Tournament Theory." Rather, it's possible that the high compensation is more a reward for those who manage to attain the top position. The promise of a large reward motivates more junior executives to work harder for the company. So, in other words, high compensation of a CEO is a reward for past performance of the CEO when he was not yet CEO. Interesting theory, anyway. http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/research/faculty/news_releases/edward.lazear/lazear.htm
To: Eugene Tackleberry
Might make sense for bigwigs who were promoted within the company. But those that were hired from elsewhere?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson