Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The coming Bush landslide (woops)
National Review | Nov 2000 | Joel Rosenberg

Posted on 06/07/2002 2:53:20 PM PDT by cd jones

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: lepton
Re:California. How much impact do you think illegal registration of 3 million non-citizens might have affected that?

Not by as much as I would have guessed before running some numbers. The final actual California results showed Gore with a 54-42% edge over Bush: 5,721,195 to 4,437,557, with 520,825 for third party candidates.

I'll assume your 3 million non-citizens number is accurate, though I really don't have any idea whether it is or not.

Let's then assume that the voter turnout for that group of people is the same as the national average in 2000 (51%). In all honesty, I think that number is probably way too high for illegals, but let's go with it.

Then we assume that those voters break the same way as Hispanics overall did in California: 68% Gore, 29% Bush. From that we can calculate how many "illegal" votes each candidate received, and subtract them from their totals.

The final result? Gore still wins, but by 8 points instead of 12. Gore 4,681,195 (51%) to Bush 3,993,857 (43%). Closer, but not enough to put the final result in doubt.

All statistics were taken from CNN's 2000 Election archives.

21 posted on 06/07/2002 6:23:52 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
Being that it was DNC associated, I would expect a much higher Percentage of votes cast for Dem candidates. As to the portion that actually voted, you're right - that's a big hitch.
22 posted on 06/08/2002 10:46:57 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Joel Rosenberg never figured it would be 36 Days. Then again in all fairness neither did the rest of us. Chalk it down as one prediction that missed hitting the bulls-eye on the barn door.

No, he was right. He just neglected to factor in Democratic vote fraud.

23 posted on 06/08/2002 10:53:19 AM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
For anyone who really wants to understand what a scam polls are (no matter who takes and publishes them) read "MOBocracy — How the media's obsession with polling twists the news, alters elections, and undermines democracy," by Matthew Robinson, 2002, Forum/Prima Publishing.

A few nuggets from an excellent, well-researched book that is chock full of real-world examples:


24 posted on 06/08/2002 11:36:56 AM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
Problem is, polls can't take into account how many illegal aliens and dead people will be voting. It isn't easy polling either group.

Wrong.

It's easy to figure the illegal votes and the votes of the dear and lately departed.

They will all vote Dumbocrap in whatever numbers are required for the Dumbs to win.

25 posted on 06/08/2002 11:43:26 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson