Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The coming Bush landslide (woops)
National Review | Nov 2000 | Joel Rosenberg

Posted on 06/07/2002 2:53:20 PM PDT by cd jones

The coming Bush landslide

Politics/Elections Front Page Opinion (Published) Keywords: IT WON'T BE A LATE NIGHT ON NOVEMBER 7TH. IT WON'T EVEN BE CLOSE
Source: National Review
Author: Joel Rosenberg

Put a fork in it. Gore's campaign is done.

The media's conventional wisdom is wrong. It won't be a late night on November 7th. It won't even be close. The hedging, bobbing, and weaving from the political punditry is mere psychological projection that Gore still has a chance. He doesn't.

Swing voters and swing states are beginning to break for Bush.
Voter turnout and intensity favor Bush.
Internal divisions within the Gore campaign favor Bush.
President Clinton's thinly veiled criticisms of the vice president's campaign in Friday's front-page New York Times bombshell only confirm what all but the most partisan political analysts would admit — there's trouble in River City and it starts with "G" and stands for "Gore."
Bottom line: An electoral landslide for the Texas governor is shaping up. And with it will come a dramatic mandate for conservative-minded reform.
Two weeks and one day before the first election of the 21st century, here's how I predict it will play out:

Final Popular Vote Prediction
Bush — 51%
Gore — 43%
Nader — 5%
Buchanan — 1%

[* NOTE: Bill Clinton never received more than 49% of the vote.]

Final Electoral Vote Prediction
Bush will rack up at least 404 electoral college votes — far above the 270 needed to win — and this will include California in the mother of all political upsets.

[* NOTE: This could actually be a conservative prediction. Reagan won 489 electoral college votes in 1980 and Bush, Sr. won 426 in 1988. Clinton won 370 and 379 respectively in 1992 and 1996.]

Leading Political Indicators
People don't like Al Gore. They don't think he's honest. They don't think he's trustworthy. They think he'll say anything to win. They believe he reeks divisive, mean-spirited political partisanship. In a word, they think he's creepy. And they're right.

By sharp contrast, voters — and particularly swing voters — like Gov. Bush. They think he's honest, strong, and comfortable in his own skin. And as the Mideast crisis heats up, they prefer the Bush-Cheney-Powell team to Clinton-Gore-Albright.

At the same time, the Gore team keeps spinning, effectively, "Sure, people may not like Gore personally but he's got the right issues."

Nonsense, for two reasons.

First, a recent Zogby poll showed that on 23 of 25 specific issue positions, Americans favor Bush to Gore. That's because Americans in the 21st century lean center-right ideologically. They want less government and more personal freedom--and these are the themes Bush internalized and sharpened in the GOP primaries in response to the center-right campaign of Steve Forbes (in contrast to John McCain's center-left campaign: freedom to pay fewer taxes, freedom to choose personal retirement accounts, freedom to choose from a wide range of Medicare plans, freedom to use MSAs, freedom for inner-city parents to choose schools that work for their kids. And such themes have worked spectacularly.

Second, Americans believe the vice president takes positions based on politics, not principle. Indeed, to try to hold his liberal base (and woo back Nader votes) Gore has venomously attacked Republicans for positions he and/or his running mate used to hold (tax cuts, Social Security choice, school choice, restrictions on abortion, opposition to special rights for homosexuals, etc)--positions most Americans still favor and haven't flip-flopped on.

Thus, the latest polls:

Portrait of America
Bush — 46
Gore — 41
Newsweek
Bush — 48
Gore — 41
Zogby
Bush — 45
Gore — 41
Battleground
Bush — 44
Gore — 40
Gallup
Bush — 50
Gore — 41
ABC News
Bush — 48
Gore — 43

Where Bush Will Win 404 Electoral Votes
Again, most analysts say this race will be a squeaker. Not true.

Bush has strong leads in states with 188 electoral votes. He is tied or slightly ahead in states with roughly another 120 to 160 electoral votes. He's also rapidly gaining ground in California and is pouring an additional $8 million there on TV ads over the next two weeks. Even Gore's California campaign chief now worries publicly that Bush can win the Golden State. He not only can, I believe he will.

Here's your election night scorecard:

Bush Country — 188 Electoral Votes
Alabama — 9
Alaska — 3
Arizona — 8
Colorado — 8
Georgia — 13
Idaho — 4
Indiana — 12
Kansas — 6
Kentucky — 8
Louisiana — 9
Mississippi — 7
Montana — 3
Nebraska — 5
Nevada — 4
North Carolina — 14
North Dakota — 3
Oklahoma — 8
South Carolina — 8
South Dakota — 3
Texas — 32
Utah — 5
Virginia — 13
Wyoming — 3

Swing States Bush Will Carry — 122 Electoral Votes
Florida — 23 Missouri — 11 Minnesota — 10 Michigan — 18 Ohio — 21 New Mexico — 5 Pennsylvania — 23 Wisconsin — 11

Democrat States Bush Will Carry — 40 Electoral Votes
Arkansas — 6
Delaware — 3
Maine — 4
Tennessee — 11
Washington — 11
West Virginia — 5

Mother-of-All-Surprises — 54 Electoral Votes
California


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2008; bush; gore; hindsight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2002 2:53:21 PM PDT by cd jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cd jones
Joel Rosenberg never figured it would be 36 Days. Then again in all fairness neither did the rest of us. Chalk it down as one prediction that missed hitting the bulls-eye on the barn door.
2 posted on 06/07/2002 2:55:32 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
All the analysts that perdicted a landslide left out on important factor:

The 5-10% gains at the voting booth DemonRats get due to vote fraud. They're getting so brazen about it now, it'll probably be more like 10-15% in future elections.

The problem is a majority of polling places are staffed with career-volunteer liberal DemonRat seniors, who are as corrupt as a Bill Clinton $13 bill.

3 posted on 06/07/2002 3:03:35 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
As for stock market touts and political analysts, I'm sticking with Jeanne Dixon ;')
4 posted on 06/07/2002 3:06:06 PM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
And this is relevant today how?
5 posted on 06/07/2002 3:18:44 PM PDT by spqrzilla9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
Had it not been for the late-breaking DUI story, which is considered responsible for three-quarters of last-minute deciders to go for Gore, this analysis (made before the DUI story) is not all that far off. I think the California prediction is over-the-top, but I do think Bush would have likely won Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and probably one of Maine's four electoral votes. That would have given him a 346-192 electoral college victory.
6 posted on 06/07/2002 3:28:20 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Problem is, polls can't take into account how many illegal aliens and dead people will be voting. It isn't easy polling either group.
7 posted on 06/07/2002 3:31:36 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spqrzilla9
Well, reminders like this may serve to keep people like Mr Rosenberg, MUGGER, and myself just a little bit humble in our "sure-fire political prognostications". We ALL went on record for a Bush landslide, based on what seemed good evidence at the time.

Hope we can see the results of this Congressional election a little more clearly...

8 posted on 06/07/2002 3:32:28 PM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
Republicans will win the midterms big too, I hear.
9 posted on 06/07/2002 3:32:49 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
Final Popular Vote Prediction
Bush — 51%
Gore — 43%
Nader — 5%
Buchanan — 1% 

Browne - (crickets chirping)

10 posted on 06/07/2002 3:40:38 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
The problem with that hypothesis is that the polls showed that it was a non-issue as far as changing any voters minds.
11 posted on 06/07/2002 4:14:28 PM PDT by Vis Numar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
How Democrats Steal Elections
Gore, Chris Sautter-"A Recount Primer"
Knock and Drag: Ryan Lizza reveals how Dems. got out the black vote
Trial Lawyers try to litigate their man into the White House
John Lott's Florida Election Study: Black Republicans, NOT Democrats disenfranchised by Dems.

Democrats cheat....Big Time.

12 posted on 06/07/2002 4:28:07 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
The problem is a majority of polling places are staffed with career-volunteer liberal DemonRat seniors, who are as corrupt as a Bill Clinton $13 bill.

Actually, it’s the Bill Clinton $6 bill.


13 posted on 06/07/2002 4:31:58 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vis Numar
The problem with that hypothesis is that the polls showed that it was a non-issue as far as changing any voters minds

Well, that's because the exit surveys couldn't cover voters who didn't vote. Karl Rove estimated that Bush lost 16 million to 19 million votes from conservative Christians who stayed home. The late revelation of the DUI charge was intended to keep these voters away from the polls, and it worked.

14 posted on 06/07/2002 4:36:36 PM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vis Numar
"The problem with that hypothesis is that the polls showed that it was a non-issue as far as changing any voters minds.

I didn't say anything about changing minds. I'm specifically talking about people who didn't make up their minds until they pulled the lever. Such people typically make up about 8% or so of the voting public, and they tend to vote 3-to-1 against the incumbent party. Exit polls showed just the opposite, however - that these voters went for Gore by the same margin, and that the DUI story was a large factor in their decision. If true, that's a 4-percentage point swing in Gore's favor. It certainly makes sense, considering the large shift in voter sentiment (as reflected by every poll) over the last three days before the election. Of course, this is all worthless drivel on my part without some source to back me up, so I'm off to go looking... :)

15 posted on 06/07/2002 4:36:48 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
The coming Bush landslide

As long as the Dow stays above 5000, that landslide will arrive Nov. 2004

16 posted on 06/07/2002 4:49:22 PM PDT by meanspirit77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cd jones
Put a fork in it. Gore's campaign is done.

Red herring.

Nobody seriously thinks Gore can win in a rematch against Bush. It's not Gore we should be worried about.

Stealth candidate Hillary is lying low for now, but she is bound and determined to be President someday.

In a legitimate election, she doesn't stand a chance, but the Dems have already proven that they will lie, cheat, and steal for the Clintons.
And with the media in their back pocket, who knows what they will try to pull in 2004.

17 posted on 06/07/2002 5:13:42 PM PDT by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vis Numar
OK, here's some source information. Not where I originally read of this after the election, and it doesn't contain concrete numbers, but the idea is there. It's the best I have time for right now.

This excerpt is from a Wisconsin Policy Research Institute report entitled "The 2000 Vote for President" by Kenneth M. Goldstein, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin at Madison:

"Given how close the race ended up, and contrary to some of the snap polling conducted in its aftermath, it seems plausible that the release of Governor Bush's drunk driving arrest did have an impact on the race. In most national polls, Bush seemed to be gaining ground and had a three or four percentage point lead. As we all know, the race ended up even and exit polls suggest many late deciders went for Gore. Although we will probably never have the data to know for certain that it was the drunk driving arrest that stopped Bush's momentum and caused late deciders to go for Gore, I think it has to be part of the story. It is very unusual for undecided voters to break toward an incumbent (which Gore essentiall was) in the last days of campaign."

Granted it's not a real scientific piece, but it does back up two of my important points: 1.) Exit polls showed undecideds went for Gore; and 2.) This is against the normal anti-incumbent trend.

Though I don't have the source material, I do recall reading shortly after the election that the DUI story was the dominant issue cited by those undecided voters who went for Gore.

For those interested in reading the entire report I have cited, you'll have to do a Google search on Kenneth Goldstein and the report title. For some reason, the direct link does not work.

18 posted on 06/07/2002 5:19:13 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
RE: California. How much impact do you think illegal registration of 3 million non-citizens might have affected that?
19 posted on 06/07/2002 5:51:29 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
One can also look at the media's difference in calling states which led people to the west to believe that Bush wasn't doing well in the east and in southern strongholds.
20 posted on 06/07/2002 5:55:10 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson