Replies

Others appreciate the opportunity to see the two items which JennyP is doing the crybaby act over. There is a constant flow of people looking at these evolution threads for the first time, and what JennyP is demanding is that these newcomers not be allowed to view the major arguments against her pet ideological doctrine. She is demanding selective censorship of ideas. Other than that, every definition of "spam" I've ever seen involves a profit motive, and I've yet to make the first penny from posting arguments against evolutionism.

Hey, if reposting 3 & 3 1/2 page essays every week - and in Medved's case, sometimes TWO DAYS IN A ROW - is acceptable here, then fine. I have several long essays I'm particularly proud of, and I'm sure many other posters here have an essay or two they're particularly proud of, and a part of me would like nothing more than to post & re-post the same essays every day. (NOTE: JUST KIDDING!)

Junior, OTOH, did the responsible thing: He put his Ultimate Creation vs. Evolution Resource on a separate website, and merely links to it when necessary. Offsite links: What a concept!

In fact, as I've said before, Medved should post his big list-o-links, his "God hates IDIOTS, too!", and for good measure his "Rufus & the Watermelon Truck" or whatever he calls it, as new articles, so they'll all be in one place in the FR archives, and be done with it. I have no problem with him posting his wiggy theories here. But I just gotta believe that SPAMming them all over the place every week violates this Posting Guideline:

Don't spam - Post your message once. If you are not sure if it has posted, check the latest posts page.

JimRob - if you think Medved's posts don't rise to the level of violating the guidelines, then I'll shut up. But please give us some guidance here.