Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Linux Gets Boost From Dell, Oracle
Forbes.com ^ | 06.05.02, 3:00 PM ET | Lisa DiCarlo

Posted on 06/06/2002 10:38:39 AM PDT by Redcloak

Operating Systems
Linux Gets Boost From Dell, Oracle
Lisa DiCarlo, 06.05.02, 3:00 PM ET

NEW YORK - In yet another strong show of support for the Linux operating system, market leaders Oracle (nasdaq: ORCL - news - people ), Dell Computer (nasdaq: DELL - news - people ) and Red Hat Software (nasdaq: RHAT - news - people ) today combined strengths to make the software more reliable, higher performance and easier to buy.

For the first time, Dell will resell licenses for Oracle's 9i database and application server software for Red Hat Linux. That lets customers avoid having to buy from two companies, and is a strong show of support of Linux from Dell, which made its fortune as a purveyor of Microsoft (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) Windows systems.

The trio is also developing more reliable Linux products for Dell's storage systems, which are actually made by EMC (nyse: EMC - news - people ). The big improvement here is that Oracle and Red Hat are developing so-called "clustering" technology for Dell servers. Typically the domain of traditional Unix, clustering is a complex way to get higher performance from a smaller number of server computers.

Oracle and Dell are both seeing growth in their Linux businesses. A Dell spokeswoman says the company expects to ship 12% "or better" of its servers with factory-installed Linux this year, up from 8% to 10% last year. International Data Group expects market revenue for Linux-based relational databases, which is what Oracle sells, to surpass Unix-based relational databases by 2006, to $6 billion.

Oracle doesn't break out product sales by platform but the company says the demand for Linux is high. A spokesperson cites its online developer network, which had 370,000 downloads of Linux-related software in the last year.

The deal is also an important win for Red Hat, which appears to be under fire from the rest of the Linux distributors. Last week, several Linux companies said they would collaborate on "standard" Linux software and distribution. Red Hat, the biggest Linux distributor, was not part of the alliance. Today's news boosted Red Hat shares nominally to $4.89 in early afternoon trading.

Linux is gaining steam everywhere but especially on Wall Street, where some information technology executives say they are demanding that their technology providers have a comprehensive Linux strategy. Microsoft is the only major technology company without one. Can it hold out forever?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: dell; linux; oracle; redhat; techindex; wallstreet; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Bush2000
Fine. You want to play that game. Windows is just a kernel, too. So I can reasonably say, by your definition, that bugs in IE and IIS are simply middleware bugs that have nothing to do with the OS.

Do you ever know what a kernel is?

41 posted on 06/07/2002 1:44:03 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Explorer is the equivalent of KFM and KDE's Window Manager
42 posted on 06/07/2002 1:45:27 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
LINUX: The Ultimate Windows Service Pack.
43 posted on 06/07/2002 1:47:08 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
Do you ever know what a kernel is?

Absolutely. I used to write kernel-level code all the time. Do you want an honest debate -- or are you going to split hairs?
44 posted on 06/07/2002 2:21:52 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I wouldn't have an issue with what you're saying if you would stop saying that Windows is just a kernel or that Linux is more than a kernel. Saying that Linux is a whole OS is like saying that an engine is an entire car.
45 posted on 06/07/2002 3:17:21 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DrDavid
NT, Windows 2K and Windows XP are an attempt to evolve MS Windows from the old MS-DOS

Hampered by the original decision by IBM that nobody would ever want more than 640k of RAM.

46 posted on 06/07/2002 3:24:06 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
The problem with AppleOSX is that it is really OpenBSD.

The problem with OpenBSD is that it does not have as many partisans (read, *really* good geeks working on neat applications). No doubt Apple will port a number of really cool applications to OpenBSD but it will, in the end, suffer the same fate as the PPC Linux versions for Apple hardware: its releases will lag the main PC platform Linux releases...

the new stuff will generally show up on the PC platform versions of Linux FIRST. Those applications that DON'T show up on the PC linux first will be ported or cloned soon enough.

Bottom line: since the PC platform stuff is SO, SO much cheaper than the Apple stuff, and the software is CLOSE ENOUGH, Apple will have a marketshare problem and be stuck as an also ran.

What makes Apple stand out is Apple software you can't get on the PC platform on software, and software that doesn't play well together on the PC platform.

I wish them luck in making the transition to OpenSource: it is NOT at ALL an easy road for a computer maker...

47 posted on 06/07/2002 3:37:47 PM PDT by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
I wouldn't have an issue with what you're saying if you would stop saying that Windows is just a kernel or that Linux is more than a kernel. Saying that Linux is a whole OS is like saying that an engine is an entire car.

That's the basic issue here: What comprises an OS. And, likewise, I wouldn't have any problem defining Linux merely as a kernel if Linux advocates weren't so disingenuous in insisting that IIS, IE, and Office are flaws in Windows. Under the terms you've described, there have been very few hacks to the Windows and Linux kernels.
48 posted on 06/07/2002 3:38:49 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
Bottom line: since the PC platform stuff is SO, SO much cheaper than the Apple stuff, and the software is CLOSE ENOUGH, Apple will have a marketshare problem and be stuck as an also ran.

The Apple partisans will take issue with this statement but there's no disputing the fact that you and I can upgrade our boxes for a couple hundred dollars and have a new motherboard and CPU.
49 posted on 06/07/2002 3:41:18 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
I wish you'd have been here a few months ago when a Apple guy was insisting that OSX was 100% 'Open Source'.

There's a lot of BSD that got stripped out of OSX, but I think it's fair to look at OSX as if it were Apple's proprietary UNIX.

BSD, and NeXT too.

Best thing about OSX right now is Microsoft OfficeX. Man, is it nice.

50 posted on 06/07/2002 3:48:16 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I don't recall PC users being able to do the equivalent of bumping a system from a single G3 300 to a Dual G4 500 without scrapping the mobo.
51 posted on 06/07/2002 3:49:12 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
soon you will have a nice, neat port of OpenOffice 1.0.
52 posted on 06/07/2002 3:51:27 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
That's the basic issue here: What comprises an OS.

At one time, wasn't it the Official Microsoft Legal Position ([tm] [all rights reserved] [click "accept" on the EULA before reading]) that IE was part of the operating system and couldn't be untangled from it without ... I dunno ... breaking the intergalactic disgronificator module, or something?

53 posted on 06/07/2002 3:53:20 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Campion
I think their position was that it couldn't be removed, not that it was a part of the kernel.
54 posted on 06/07/2002 3:54:27 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
I'm lots more interested in OpenBeOS, if you can provide me an FTP link to the installable binaries. I was running BeOS feverishly for months until the whole BeOS scene croaked. I still have the installable MS Windows installer for it on a MO drive around here somewhere.

How mature is it? Did they just pick up where the old one left off? Last time I used it, they were porting Mozilla over to it, and the WWW looked like crap. BeOS's own browser was lots better.

55 posted on 06/07/2002 3:55:08 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
I don't recall PC users being able to do the equivalent of bumping a system from a single G3 300 to a Dual G4 500 without scrapping the mobo.

Get real. I can buy a dual proc motherboard and only put a single CPU in it. And then upgrade the processors at a later date.
56 posted on 06/07/2002 3:56:05 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
www.beos.com doesn't resolve to anything.
57 posted on 06/07/2002 3:58:56 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
4. There's nothing that a Linux PC can do that a Sun system can't do better -- even though it may cost a little more.

Hmmm... Let's see.

Redhat 7.3 or Solaris 8?

Redhat 7.3! Solaris? Only as the platform for a Sun box, not an Intel one.

58 posted on 06/07/2002 4:03:35 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
OpenBeOS Programming Teams Status Overview

Programming Teams Status Overview

Last Updated On:  4 Jun 2002



    Planning Pre-alpha Alpha  Beta  Stable Mature  
                 
Kernel    
App / Interface Kit    
BFS    
Game Kit    
Input Kit    
Media Kit    
MIDI Kit    
Networking    
Preferences    
Printing    
ScreenSaver Kit    
Storage Kit    
Translation Kit    
Ugh, this is gonna take until Q2 2003. Wake me when it's done.

59 posted on 06/07/2002 4:03:56 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
I can assure you, I wouldn't be using it if I had to deal with the product activation $hit that off the shelf copies have.

Believe it or not, this has been cracked wide open. I'm not talking about using a corporate license which doesn't need activation. I'm talking about C-R-A-C-K-E-D! And used C# to do it on VS .NET!

I couldn't believe my eyes.

The culprits? Oh, just a couple of worthless "dorm-room-operating-system-using" Linux guys. ;-)

60 posted on 06/07/2002 4:08:56 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson