Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"the rape scene of the little girl was real and disgusting....a child was harmed and all people can talk about is brenda watching her husband have consensual legal sex w/a 3rd party "

Not that I approve of porn, but this was an ANIMATION. What child was "harmed"?

45 posted on 06/06/2002 6:51:38 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom
Rick Robert's Reporter named "River" left us with the impression that it was NOT an animation displayed on the slide show during the prosecution's opening statement. That is what I am basing my statement on. She said that the picture was displayed next to Danielles at the same time. She said the little girl looked just like Danielle except that she had red hair and not blonde hair.
51 posted on 06/06/2002 6:54:05 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalmom
Not that I approve of porn, but this was an ANIMATION. What child was "harmed"?

Oh, I'm sorry, I can't let that pass! The short answer: "Danielle."

The somewhat longer answer, "Apparently you don't think so but I believe the answer is Danielle."

The longest answer, I haven't got the time right now to give, but it involves fantasies that require more and more to provide stimulation and escalate into actual deviant behavior.

59 posted on 06/06/2002 7:01:29 AM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson