To: Ol' Sparky
Laura Ingraham another McCain supporter lashes out. There was a piece on this on tonight's Special Report. I didn't pay a whole lot of attention, but will watch the rerun later. I't didn't have the tone of Laura's alarm
3 posted on
06/03/2002 5:00:05 PM PDT by
UB355
To: UB355
Wasn't Laura Ingraham a clerk for Clarence Thomas? If so, it would certainly qualify her to speak on this subject.
6 posted on
06/03/2002 5:38:12 PM PDT by
Huck
To: UB355
Laura Ingraham another McCain supporter lashes out. There was a piece on this on tonight's Special Report. I didn't pay a whole lot of attention, but will watch the rerun later. I't didn't have the tone of Laura's alarm...it didn't have that alarming tone because this "reversal" is not seen as a "betrayal" at Fox...the draconian quota requirements now causing so many problems are not a part of the original law, but rather of regulations for implementation written by Clinton's Education Department - the Bush people do not want to dignify these regulations and have them perhaps made permanent by some possibly Clinton-appointed judge, so they want the case to stay out of the courts - probably so eventually they will be able to rewrite the regulations themselves - as Ingraham herself suggests at the end of her article.......
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson