Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Your Friend, the State
Lew Rockwell.com ^ | June 1, 2002 | Joseph Sobran

Posted on 06/02/2002 2:35:52 PM PDT by Henrietta

Your Friend, the State

by Joseph Sobran

Albert Jay Nock, an excellent but largely forgotten writer, once wrote a little book titled Our Enemy, the State. I still reread it when I’m groggy from absorption in the daily events of politics. It revives me like a slap in the face.

If I were a pagan, I might fancy I heard the Olympian laughter of the gods when modern men think of their rulers as their friends. Common sense would suggest that those who have power over you, and can use it to kill or enslave you, are, more properly speaking, your masters and enemies. We’re supposed to think that the system that can extort half our earnings from us is benevolent?

I don’t think it’s funny, but I can see how Zeus and Neptune and Mercury, with their larger perspective, might get a kick out of it. As described by Homer and Ovid, they didn’t have to pay taxes. They could afford to laugh. “What fools these mortals be!”

The state is a parasite on its subjects, but in America its subjects have acquired the habit of speaking of the state as “we.” As in: “We are fighting a war on terrorism.” There can be no greater triumph for the parasite than for the host to think of it and itself as a single unit. It’s as if a man were to refer to himself and a blood-bloated leech under his skin as “we.”

How does the state pull this off? One tested and well-nigh infallible method is to convince its subjects that it’s protecting them from an even worse enemy than itself. This seldom fails. The majority nearly always fall for the idea that if the state is hurting someone else even worse than it’s hurting them, it’s on their side, and is therefore their friend, protector, and benefactor.

The Soviet Union crushed every freedom worth having, but it assured the “proletariat” that it was only exterminating their “class enemies.” Hitler imposed tyranny on ordinary Germans, but he was even crueler to Jews, so Germans figured he was on their side. The socialist state of Israel robs Jews blind, but since it treats Arabs even worse, Jews think of the state as “us.” And the U.S. Government is stripping away traditional American freedoms; but as long as it is prepared to bomb foreigners to death, Americans imagine that their proximate enemy is defending them. No, it’s even worse than that: they think their enemy is “us.” The enemy becomes the self.

What a blessing “terrorism” is for the state! It’s the ideal distraction from the day-to-day reality of the state’s chief activity: wringing from its subjects the wealth they produce. Last September a handful of fanatics, armed only with box-cutters, provided a new rationale for the trillion-dollar swindle. A bonanza!

I don’t know what these “terrorists” thought they were achieving: Making the infidel respect Allah? If so, they were wrong. You might as well try to make the U.S. Government respect the U.S. Constitution. Ain’t gonna happen. They only made the average American cling all the more tightly to his state.

Orwell, with his Olympian humor, summed up this eerie state of affairs in two words: Big Brother. The all-powerful master feigning blood kinship with his feckless subjects. “We.”

Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, arrives at an illusory happy ending: “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.” And no doubt he pasted a decal of Big Brother’s flag – “our” flag – onto his windshield.

When I was ten, I learned how to get a leech out of my leg in a hurry: a lighted match would do the trick. I never supposed that that creepy thing and I were “we.”

But try getting a parasite out of your mind! As soon as you think you’re rid of it, it has a way of coming back. You’ve been trained from childhood to think of your rulers as “we,” just as sports fans speak of the home team as “we,” as if they too had been down on the field earning the victory. Such mental habits are hard to shake.

Even the most wary of us have to keep reminding ourselves that the state is our enemy. Always. Not just when the Republicans – or the Democrats – are in power. Always. Tyranny and freedom are equally nonpartisan.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: terrorists; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2002 2:35:52 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
If Rockwell's point is that the State is as much an enemy of liberty in wartime as in peace, I concur. If, however, he's stating that effecting a war against our nation's enemies is not a legitimate purpose of government, then he's more full of crap than an Afghan outhouse.

I believe I can make the blanket statement that government is NEVER our friend, and only rarely our guardian. It is most often that which must be guarded against. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch our watchers?

2 posted on 06/02/2002 2:46:53 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Bump for AJ Nock!
3 posted on 06/02/2002 2:49:51 PM PDT by AK2KX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
>>>You might as well try to make the U.S. Government respect the U.S. Constitution. Ain’t gonna happen. <<<

Amen.

4 posted on 06/02/2002 3:27:05 PM PDT by Archaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Your Friend, the State

The title should be "Your Fiend, the State."

5 posted on 06/02/2002 3:36:03 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"If, however, he's stating that effecting a war against our nation's enemies is not a legitimate purpose of government, then he's more full of crap than an Afghan outhouse."

I don't see him saying that here.

6 posted on 06/02/2002 4:25:20 PM PDT by Gigantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Joe Sobran, anarchist. The boy is one poot from a full blown download.
7 posted on 06/02/2002 4:40:36 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
How can anyone doubt that the greatest enemy of mankind is the state? It seems as obvious as the sun rising in the East.
8 posted on 06/02/2002 5:35:47 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gigantor
One tested and well-nigh infallible method is to convince its subjects that it’s protecting them from an even worse enemy than itself. This seldom fails. The majority nearly always fall for the idea that if the state is hurting someone else even worse than it’s hurting them, it’s on their side, and is therefore their friend, protector, and benefactor.

I don't see the war on terrorism as quite that contrived. The Trade Center didn't collapse because of a high wind. I understand the Hitlerian tactic of uniting against a common enemy (meanwhile ignoring the enemy within) but al-Qaida and Allah's legions aren't fiction.

For Sobran to maintain that this war is an example of the "infallible method" he cites is to raise the even more disturbing specter of outright paranoia.

9 posted on 06/02/2002 5:38:26 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
"Orwell... ":

"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." --George Orwell

10 posted on 06/02/2002 5:43:22 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
It is a side of Buchananite antisemitic Sobran I have never before seen. I think he is heading for a melt down.
11 posted on 06/02/2002 5:44:59 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
How can anyone doubt that the greatest enemy of mankind is the state? It seems as obvious as the sun rising in the East.

Then why has the “state” existed from the time men left their caves?

12 posted on 06/02/2002 5:48:38 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
I think he's saying that the way the Government is fighting the war is only geared towards gaining control over the population, not to actually defend it. For example, passing Patriot Act and increasing surveillance of law-abiding American citizens, instead of guarding the borders.
13 posted on 06/02/2002 5:58:26 PM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
I think he's saying that the way the Government is fighting the war is only geared towards gaining control over the population, not to actually defend it.

I wish he could have been as succinct as you have. I'll certainly buy that argument, or at least heed it. We need to be ever vigilant against further encroachments on our liberties in the name of "security." The administration's record on this front isn't very good, I'm afraid.

14 posted on 06/02/2002 6:13:26 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"The majority nearly always fall for the idea that if the state is hurting someone else even worse than it’s hurting them, it’s on their side, and is therefore their friend, protector, and benefactor."

This struck me as referring to class warfare, but on second thought, you may be right.

15 posted on 06/02/2002 8:40:33 PM PDT by Gigantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Then why has the "state" existed from the time men left their caves?

Because, it is the doom of men, that they forget....

the infowarrior

16 posted on 06/03/2002 2:22:57 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
The state is a parasite on its subjects, but in America its subjects have acquired the habit of speaking of the state as “we.”

17 posted on 06/03/2002 4:52:43 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
"The whip is not so bad. Fear,instead,my brother who will use scorpions."

I forget who said it,but it's a tried and true tactic.

18 posted on 06/04/2002 5:54:34 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
It is healthy to be cautious sbout state power and to remain vigilent to resist its excesses.

It is pathological to obsess about it as Sobran does.

19 posted on 06/04/2002 5:59:11 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You're posing intelligent questions to folks who are accustomed to thinking with with their glands--not their brains.

It's a shame we can't find a place womewhere they could all emigrate, set up a society without laws, government, or law enforcement authorities, where they could smoke dope to their hearts' content and remain free and happy forevermore.

That would sure show us.

20 posted on 06/04/2002 6:03:48 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson