Posted on 05/31/2002 6:33:23 AM PDT by TroutStalker
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:46:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
YAKIMA, Wash. -- In 1994, the future looked bleak for the Piper Super Cub, a fabric-skinned two-seat puddle jumper with a cult-like following among pilots.
Amid a wave of liability lawsuits that sent the entire light-plane industry into a crisis, the Cub's maker went out of business. The company that re-emerged, New Piper Aircraft Inc., said it couldn't get insurance if it resumed building the airplane that had made Piper's name synonymous with grassroots aviation since the 1930s.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
SKYYYYYY KINNGGGGG!!!!
Those prices can not be correct, or they will have a hard time selling them.
There are two types of taildragger pilots, those that have groundlooped and those that will groundloop someday........
So I was told. : )
They are incredible airplanes with all of the peculiarities mentioned in the article. And yes, taildraggers are notoriously finicky about your landing skills. Fortunately they touch down at about 35 or 40 miles per hour so even if you really screw up you usually only embarass yourself.
I have taken many people up for their first small plane ride in my Cub. Once in the air, anyone can fly the plane as it is one of the most forgiving aircraft out there.
The simple reason Cub Crafters is making hay with their Cub is that there is a tremendous demand for that particular airplane. A Super Cub is like a Jeep on steroids in the airplane world. Things can be done with them by a skillful pilot that would leave any witness flabbergast.
A vintage 1950's Super Cub that has been through Hades will bring $100,000.00! A decent one easily $150,000.00. So the new and only slightly improved versions from Cub Crafters are a relative bargain. It's little brother, the J-3 Cub is essentially identical in dimension but with a motor only about one third as powerful.
The J-3 Cub was used to train 90% of our WWII pilots as their first plane. Eisenhower himself was a competent Cub pilot. If you can land a Cub, the rest are just variations on a theme.
I loved the simplicity of the Cub. We flew with a friend to an EAA fly-in at a farm where we landed between the corn fields.
The Cub is the only plane I have fewer landings in than takeoffs.
I have been told that an airplane is much simpler to make than a car, so where are our $20K airplanes? Is it just the stupid trial lawers who are preventing us from having them?
The amount of time required to build a plane from a kit is huge. All of these people were perfectionists, and every Experimental plane has to be inspected at several stages of assembly by the FAA. They are doing it for love, not money.
Planes, like cars, are assembled most efficiently on a production line. As soon as this company gets big enough, you can bet the lawyers will be on it as soon as some pilot makes an eror.
There were no brakes which made taxiing downhill very interesting.

I am currently building a Challenger II and should have it ready to fly in about two months. It does take a long time to build, but that is half of the fun.
The performance of the two seat Challenger II is very close to the Piper J-3, but because of it's low weight, it is also a good glider. There is nothing more fun than to turn off the engine and ride the thermals for hours. Then when you get bored, you just fire up the engine and fly back home.
Nowadays, that's how I run my trucking business. Without a pot of gold at the end of the lawsuit, the lawyers go elswhere.
I run my trucks and drivers in the safest manner I can because it's to my benefit to do so. I run only the absolute, state mandated, minimum liability. And I save a bundle in premiums. The savings are just about equal to my profit margin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.