Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
Might as well take the opening to state what my beliefs are.

I believe that federal environmental regualtions should be limited to air pollutants that traverse state borders and interstate waterway pollution.

I believe all other forms of environmental regulations should be up to the individual states. That way, each state could craft a system best suited to that state's economy and that state's peoples' tastes. Heck, some states might even choose your model. We would see competition of ideas, and the best solutions evolving from trial and error.

59 posted on 05/30/2002 5:37:27 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Dales
I believe that federal environmental regualtions should be limited to air pollutants that traverse state borders and interstate waterway pollution.

Are you familiar with CWA 303(d) TMDLs for non-point pollution control? If you aren't you should know that they are being used as a principle tool of land use control and regulation of development. It's all being done by lawsuit in the States pursuant to an EPA sweetheart suit with the NRDC. It is a real estate scam of the first order.

Maybe you had better rethink that preference. My system is capable of global networking, BTW.

63 posted on 05/30/2002 6:39:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson