[luvbach1]

Yes, a film negative could be enlarged and enhanced to a significant degree. Still, even if it is established that it is her ring, it will only one more piece of circumstantial evidence with no proof he took it from her dead body.

[Registered]

Again, my point being that initial news reports said the ring was FOUND with the body. Now we have contridicting reports, but the Washington Times reported it FOUND. If Gary had it on his finger last summer, how did it end up with her skeletal remains? Hmmm?